about being liberal or conservative anymore y'all. That is a hype offered by the fascist whores who want to confuse the people with lies while they turn this country into an aristocratic police state. Some people will say anything to attain power and money. There is no such thing as the Liberal Media, but the Corporate media is very real.
Jesse Dollemore uses the words of the Republicans to make his point.
So when Bill Clinton lies about an extra-marital affair these Republicans see corruption and the
need to cleanse the office. But when a President constantly lies about everything, is making money
(extortion) from his various hotels and golf courses by various foreign interests, has been
"laundering" money from Russian oligarchs for decades, has obviously obstructed justice which the
Mueller report states on definately ten occasions, wink-winks with a hostile foreign power to get
dirt on a political opponent, and has been unfaithful to his own wife on numerous occasions ...
these Republicans do nothing, and carry that President's dirty water.
Fucking hypocrites. Can y'all have a spine and back the constitutional republic, please.
Tuesday, 23 April 2019 at 18h 54m 34s
Impeach this mother fucker
I agree with Mike Malloy.
You even so much as countenance the aide of a hostile foreign power with a wink to help you in a
domestic election and that is called treason. Should we be okay with Mexican oligarchs buying
politicians in Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Arizona, and California because ... ? Or what if the
Chinese funded state political campaigns all across the West Coast states? Corporate interests and
wealthy plutocrats that have nominal American citizenship have been carving out influence and
whatnot for the last 40 years, but never has their been a political campaign that played wink wink
with foreign oligarchs.
The NRA received funds from Russian Oligarchs and got infiltrated by a Russian female spy.
There was a underage ring of Florida "Massage Parlors" run by a Chinese national, who has been in
numerous photographs with Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Trump Junior. In a recent FBI raid, the
owner of the New England Patriots was busted with multiple engagements.
A Chinese national successfully got a room at Mar-e-largo, the Trump Florida "Golf Club" estate
where she had numerous spyware on hand, attempting to do what spies do.
The Kushner's were selling Chinese investors rights of citizenship at a business convention within 6
months after the election.
You can look up all this yourself. I suggest you do.
I am so disgusted with these people. If ever there was a time to impeach a president just as an
exercise of the people's democracy, THIS. IS. IT.
In these United States, we have a history of impeaching in the House, but not convicting in the
Senate. Or a President resigns. In the former case, Andrew Johnston was impeached because of his
nasty habit of appointing Southern apologists to federal positions in the 2 or 3 years after the
civil war. Bill Clinton lied about receiving an extra-marital blowjob from Monica Lewinsky while in
the holy sanctimony of the white house. Richard Nixon resigned -- because he would have become the
first President to be convicted by the Senate.
And just in case you need a quick refresher, here is Shep Smith from (of all places) Fox News
Saturday, 20 April 2019 at 10h 44m 56s
True Patriots rise to the Top
Representative Elijah Cummings from Maryland speaks with Mika and Joe on the Morning Joe show at MSNBC.
Saturday, 20 April 2019 at 10h 15m 56s
The Mueller Report
Jesse Dollemore does an excellent piece. Jesse is an ex-Marine. He is a true patriot.
Right before the 4:20 mark (on 4-20 day in San Francisco LOL)
What Robert Mueller absolutely did not do was exonerate Donald Trump.
Even Shep Smith at Fox News has words on this matter.
Shep has been (along with Chris Wallace) the lone semi-moral authority at an otherwise despicable
propaganda corporation, ie. willing participants (perhaps with good intentions) hired to give a
somewhat moral face, just like mobsters hiring lawyers. A broken clock is always correct twice in
24 hours, hence even Fox News can hire 2 people who have some moral center despite their ideological
Thursday, 18 April 2019 at 19h 24m 19s
OMG can we just accept the truth and do what is necessary to save our Republic
Randi Rhodes brings it hard and true with her New York accent. I love this woman with all my heart.
Even Chris Wallace at Fox News cannot swallow this thing whole.
"I suspect that Democrats heads are
The above video is put together by Brian Tyler Cohen, a recent youtube'r that I have come to
respect. I suggest you subscribe because he is fair and on point in addition to being quite adept at
being convincing to the lowest denominator. You will also get an education.
"Then again, holding a press conference about a report before it gets out, is also as desperate as
it gets. And not exactly something you need to do if you are fully exonerated."
Fuck yea assholes eat that whole and swallow hard.
Wednesday, 3 April 2019 at 18h 10m 17s
Does Sugar consumption cause Cancer?
At the timestamp 28 seconds, the question "Does Sugar Consumption cause ..
Yes. I think that eating too much sugar increases definitely the ... probability of getting cancer
... and also make the outcome of people who already have cancer [is] worse."
This is why I absolutely hate it when fucking Safeway asks me to donate towards "fighting" Cancer and I
am like, WTF, 80% of your store is contributing to adding sugars that promote cancer. Cancer cells
have more insulin receptors than other cells. They literally thrive in a high blood glucose
environment. It's not genetic mutations so much as it is inhibiting your body's natural response to
cancer cells because the high blood glucose environment is overwhelming our bodies natural ability to
kill and defeat miscreant cells.
Are you "standing up for cancer" when you put those high-sugar added items into your shopping cart?
Thank God modern science is coming around. So many people can now avoid this modern syndrome.
Wednesday, 3 April 2019 at 17h 57m 15s
Oh my god
Why are we ignoring the Red Flags, the signs of obvious insanity.
A 4 page summary does not do a 300 page report any justice.
Sunday, 31 March 2019 at 15h 16m 39s
I love Samantha Bee
These assholes cut taxes for the wealthy in the belief that the wealthy invest in society that is
functional to the larger macroscopic society. Then they act all statesmen-like and conservative by
saying they have to be economical and cut government investment (which they call spending) in the
larger macroscopic society. The belief that the patriarchs of any social order automatically make
the best investment choices for the larger macroscopic society is ... however ... flawed.
Some wealthy families and persons understand the larger macroscopic picture that connects the wealth
of a society and the distribution of wealth within a society. Other patriarchs are more
microscopic, viewing wealth acquisition as an inherent right or an indication (proof) of their
merit, because they worked hard, made the right choices, and so deserve their claim to a larger
proportion of the society's production. Being better positioned to understand the future of
investment choices, the notion is that less taxes on the wealthy promotes smart and functional
Which is wierd because nothing in the historical past would ever give anyone a reason to believe
this fallacy. The modern nation state that evolved from the rural/tribal economy had to deal with a
vast majority of people who did not work on farms and either lived in cities or worked in a part of
the economy that was not agricultural in origin. When the mass of the social order was based upon
agriculture and small artisan production, as was the case before the industrial revolution, local
political regimes were more relevant, although they did mesh within the larger statehood that did
exist since ancient times. However, the transportation and communication facilities at the time
inhibited the potential control management systems that now exist in the modern world. Hence in the
modern world the owning classes squeeze the lower orders of the economic system and hide it behind
some stale philosophical sophistry.
This is why government investment is necessary in order to make the larger environment function for