frankilin roosevelt

It's not about being liberal or conservative anymore y'all. That is a hype offered by the fascist whores who want to confuse the people with lies while they turn this country into an aristocratic police state. Some people will say anything to attain power and money. There is no such thing as the Liberal Media, but the Corporate media is very real.



Check out my old  Voice of the People page.


Gino Napoli
San Francisco, California
High School Math Teacher

jonsdarc@mindspring.com




Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.

a middle-aged
George Washington



ARCHIVES
1088 POSTS
LATEST ITEM

October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
September 2014
August 2014
May 2014
March 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
August 2009
July 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

Sunday, 13 January 2008 at 20h 22m 16s

America Has Spoken



Thanks bartcop


Sunday, 13 January 2008 at 18h 11m 54s

Mindless whores who like their 7 figure salaries

"The media horseshit produced in New Hampshire was worse than useless; not only arrogant, mindless and sheeplike, per usual, but also wrong on the very horse-race measurements upon which these faux smarties pride themselves. How can an entire industry continue to exist when the product it provides is both unwanted and defective, and proven repeatedly to be so?"

[SOURCE: Eric Alterman | Altercation.com | 10 January 2008

Exceptionally moronic and insane are Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough. Why are these lying sack of shits getting paid millions of dollars to "pretend' like they don't serve an agenda that is anti-democratic in spirit. Here is a snippet of the two of them from the December 12 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~


MATTHEWS: I was thinking that -- Giuliani's the other strong favorite. He's once again selected as the best leader, the most experienced, and I think the best chance to win. But the fact that he's still the best leader in the Republican Party is the key thing. Republicans like leaders, and I still think that's why he's the front-runner. If you look down the stretch, he can win the big states with the unit rule. He could do well in Florida; he can do well in New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, California, Washington, Oregon. He could win the coasts big time and win the nomination a little slower and a little dirtier than he'd like, but he'll win it.

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, but isn't it -- sorry -- isn't it because people just think he simply can win, as opposed to whether or not they agree with what he stands for? Is it -- are we still there?

MATTHEWS: Yeah, that's where they're at. You're right, Mika. They think he can win it. And they think he's a leader, and they think he might be an SOB. And one thing is, he's an authentic SOB.

I mean, he really looks like one, acts like one, talks like one -- he is the real thing. He is not a nice guy; he's a tough guy. And at 3 o'clock in the morning on the subway, do you want a nice guy to get on -- do you want Huckabee joining you on the subway - - or do you want this guy who looks like he might just have brass knuckles on? You don't know.

SCARBOROUGH: I want Giuliani sitting next to me on the subway.

BRZEZINSKI: You don't want Huckabee?

MATTHEWS: I think that's what you want. You want [former New York City police commissioner] Bernie Kerik sitting next to you on the subway is what you really want.

SCARBOROUGH: You're damn straight I want Bernie Kerik. I will not criticize Bernie Kerik --

BRZEZINSKI: Oh, Lord!

SCARBOROUGH: -- because I can walk around the streets of New York City at 2 in the morning and not be afraid for my life.

BRZEZINSKI: Chris --

SCARBOROUGH: You're damn --

MATTHEWS: I felt that, Joe.

SCARBOROUGH: You're damn straight.

MATTHEWS: Joe, I'm an out-of-towner, too.

[SOURCE: MSNBC MORNING JOE |  | 12 December 2008]

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Amazing how this is considered insightful and provocative commentary on morning television. Rudy's heavy-handed police tactics shot at, killed, and harassed people of color far out of proportion to the declining crime rate which had nothing to do with Rudy. Money that was available occurred before he became Mayor. They praise for the mob lackey Bernie Kerik without mentioning the adulterous romps in an apartment paid for by the city, along with the complete politicization and corruption of the the police departments. But Christy Matthews praises the man because he can walk the streets at night, and Joey Scarborough wants to sit next to Rudy on the subway. Case closed. The historical record be damned.

What nightmares these two men must have in their subconscious reality.


Sunday, 13 January 2008 at 8h 24m 3s

Wait a minute

In what could be a first in the world of political advertising, a message created by a deeply unhappy Arkansas voter that initially came alive on the web in December is going to air on television tonight in the important primary state of South Carolina, right in the middle of a Fox News debate among the Republican presidential candidates.

The minute-long advertisement attacks Republican Mike Huckabee for the release of convicted serial rapist Wayne Dumond during Huckabee's tenure as Arkansas governor. Dumond went on to kill a woman named Carol Sue Shields in Missouri. The spot features Shields' mother, Lois Davidson, who tells viewers "If not for Mike Huckabee, Wayne Dumond would be in prison and Carol Sue would be with us."


[SOURCE: Sarah Lai Stirland | Wired | 10 January 2008]

But that's not all. Huckabee released Dumond over the advice of the state pardon board because of a political hoopla from some right wing radio talk shows that Clinton was covering up his involvement and scapegoating Dumond. But don't just believe me.

As Clinton rose to national prominence, the case came to the attention of his critics. Journalists and talk show hosts questioned the victim’s story and suggested that DuMond had been railroaded by the former governor. Steve Dunleavy, a New York Post columnist, took up the case as a cause, calling DuMond’s conviction “a travesty of justice.” […]

When Huckabee became governor in 1996, he expressed doubts about DuMond’s guilt and said he was considering commuting his sentence to time served. After the victim and her supporters protested, Huckabee decided against commutation.


[SOURCE:  | CBS NEWS | 5 December 2007]


Thursday, 10 January 2008 at 7h 57m 9s

Astronomy and Jesus


Is the birth of Jesus -- as leftover over to us by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John -- really just the leftover co-optation by the Romans of the pagan rituals?

The birth sequence is completely astrological. The star in the east is Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky, on December 24th, aligns with the 3 brightest stars in Orion's Belt. These 3 bright stars are called today what they were called in ancient times: The Three Kings and the brightest star, Sirius, all point to the place of the sunrise on December 25th. This is why the Three Kings "follow" the star in the east, in order to locate the sunrise -- the birth of the sun. [SOURCE:]

The Romans were losing their grip on their far flung empire even before the bad ole 300s when the "barbarian invasions" began to appear. What were called "Christian" cults were cropping up all over the various districts of the empire. In fact, these early groups were very many different types of groups, many of them non-Christian, pagan groups who actually gathered together to perform their rituals in tribune to the Earth's spirits and such. Holy groups worshipping the baby Jesus? Far from it. But nevertheless, these groups were very numerous and growing in the period from 200 BC and on. Creating a state religion and then requiring all gatherings to be registered with the state was a step towards attempting to control the population. The Roman Church is an outgrowth of the old Roman Empire's bureaucracy of social control.

For all we know, these stories that are revered in the "Holy Bible" could be just ancient myth- makers working in league with the tyranny of their day to keep the people down and in their place.

Mind you, the great spirit is everywhere, pervading all things, but not in any one book. Rather a little piece in every single book that ever existed, even if a mere speck in the books and mouths of liars.


Thursday, 10 January 2008 at 19h 39m 34s

The FBI can't even pay the bills with the people's money

This is just too incredible to be funny, but I had to share this with y'all.


Telephone companies have cut off FBI wiretaps used to eavesdrop on suspected criminals because of the bureau's repeated failures to pay phone bills on time.

A Justice Department audit released Thursday[100K PDF file] blamed the lost connections on the FBI's lax oversight of money used in undercover investigations. In one office alone, unpaid costs for wiretaps from one phone company totaled $66,000.

In at least one case, a wiretap used in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act investigation "was halted due to untimely payment," the audit found. FISA wiretaps are used in the government's most sensitive and secretive criminal and intelligence investigations, and allow eavesdropping on suspected terrorists or spies.

"We also found that late payments have resulted in telecommunications carriers actually disconnecting phone lines established to deliver surveillance results to the FBI, resulting in lost evidence," according to the audit by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine.

More than half of 990 bills to pay for telecommunication surveillance in five unidentified FBI field offices were not paid on time, the report shows.

..."It seems the telecoms, who are claiming they were just being 'good patriots' when they allowed the government to spy on us without warrants, are more than willing to pull the plug on national security investigations when the government falls behind on its bills," said former FBI agent Michael German, the ACLU's national security policy counsel. "To put it bluntly, it sounds as though the telecoms believe it when the FBI says the warrant is in the mail but not when they say the check is in the mail."

...The faulty bookkeeping was blamed, in large part, for an FBI employee who pleaded guilty in June 2006 to stealing $25,000 for her own use, the audit noted.

"As demonstrated by the FBI employee who stole funds intended to support undercover activities, procedural controls by themselves have not ensured proper tracking and use of confidential case funds," it concluded.


[SOURCE: Lara Jakes Jordan | AP News | 10 January 2008]


Friday, 4 January 2008 at 19h 32m 54s

Father and son

Earl Baron Lacour III Earl Baron Lacour IV

This is my best friend and his first born child, now aged 15. I've known that long-hair freak since he first got into the womb. I won't explain that one, but Barry and Kelly understand what I'm saying.

My other friend Rob's first (and probably only) born Brody is alive and kicking at 18 months, already walking on his own and getting ready to say daddy. I neglected to take those pictures though.


Friday, 4 January 2008 at 20h 4m 18s

A summary of subprime mortgage SIVs and CDOs

In case you haven't been paying attention, or if you don't really understand economics, this is the best quick summary of the big picture over the subprime mortgages.

banks made loans to homeowners who did not have to prove their ability to pay, then quickly sold the loans to other companies. By the time it emerged that a lot of homeowners could not pay, these loans had been pooled with other loans and chopped into strange new paper assets that were sold to unsuspecting buyers around the globe. The subsequent reckoning has forced major banks to write off vast sums of money.

“Here you had all these people who were supposed to be sophisticated investors, and it turns out they were buying billions of dollars worth of debt where they didn’t even understand what they owned,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research.


[SOURCE: Peter S Goodman | New York Times | 30 December 2007  ]

A "SIV" is the acronym for Structured Investment Vehicle. CDOs are Collateralized Debt Obligations.

Let me explain. Collateral is something of value that backs the loan. Here's an example of what collateral means in the real world. When you take out a 5 year loan on a car (something they call "financing") the value of the car is the collateral of the loan. This means that if you balk on the loan after, say, 14 months, the collateral value of the car plus the payments over the 14 months is the economic accountanting that takes place.

You buy a Toyota that is $20,000 wholesale, but sold for to you $22,000. Toyota "finances" a loan, which means the finance company buys the $20,000 wholesale and keeps the title until the loan is paid. If you make $350 payments for 14 months you have paid $4900. At 10% interest, about half or less would be collected as interest on the loan, but this really depends on the finance charges the company takes after the car is repossessed, since the blue book value is still $20,000 after 14 months. Now after adding the $4900 to the $20,000, the finance company has assets of $24,900 less the $20,000 wholesale price, or $4900 profits over 14 months. Say the finance company sells the car back to the Toyota dealer for $17000. This yields them a total of $21,900 ... which is net gain of $1900 more than the original $20000 wholesale price: a 9.5% gain over 14 months, or 8.1% per year.

Housing and Real Estate work the same way, except that housing generally appreciates over time, unlike automobiles, which depreciate (decrease) in value over a relatively brief span of time. A 20 year old car is generally worthless and unusable, unless it is an antique; but a 20 year old house is usually 10 times more money in value. Plus, if that house is an apartment building or 20 story office tower, the property receives a regular supply of rental income.

However, the value of houses & properties are tied to supply, location, and the average income of those who inhabit the cities, towns, and suburbs where the houses are located. People have to be able to buy the houses, or they will continue to rent apartments. The monthly payments necessary to finance housing purchases cannot be too much larger than the average necessary rental costs, or very few persons will be able to afford the monthly payments. Most lenders and real estate brokers will say no more than a third of one's income. And don't forget property taxes and interest payments.

Housing and real estate in general are not always commodities that attract investors, because houses don't create their own value like a factory or communications corporation does. The value of a piece of property is more directly related to the number of purchasers. In the case of business real estate, it is a function of the ability of businesses to earn revenue over and above their costs plus the cost of leasing the property. The value of the property, the ability to "generate" revenue is contingent upon local economic conditions and location.

Which brings me to the other acronym, the Structured Investment Vehicle, or SIV. This is what the investment gurus call bundling the various financial agreements and mortgage payments into an agglomeration of say 2,000. This is the "vehicle" thru which real estate values became part of the securities market. A "security" is a piece of paper that confers a percentage payment. "Securitizing" means you obtain funds based upon the inherent value of the "security" such as a stock, or a corporate receivable.

Bonds are loans to public institutions. The value of a bond is the amount of repaid funds after a period of time. A value of a bond is based upon how much will be repaid after a period of time. The United States, or Canada, or Germany, are safely assumed to always make the quarterly interest payments for 10 years, so the value of bonds don't change much over time. A bond rate of 4.5% means you purchase the bond for 95.5% (100 minus 4.5%) of the value knowing you are 99.9999% guaranteed to get your 4.5% return per year. A large demand for bonds is indicative of investors who are leery of the alternatives and want a "safer" investment. This however reduces the value because more people wanting a limited quantity causes the price to go up.

When banks and investment firms are holding collateral and securities that drop in value, the equity and assets on their balance sheets reduce their ratios of cash to liabilities. In order to maintain the necessary ratios to stay solvent, banks have to hold on to their cash. The Fed can liquify the system, but the banks are still "borrowing" from the Fed. This is why the Fed interest rate decisions are a very big deal. Lowering the Fed rate costs the banks less money when they borrow from the Fed. Mind you they don't actually "pay" this money. What happens is they buy Treasuries equivalent to the interest on the Fed loans. The money from the Fed are backed by the Federal bonds that are sold.

As you can see, all this is pretty complicated, inter-related stuff. It's taken me 20 plus years to figure this much out, and I'm still not quite able to grasp the entirety of the macroscopically inter-related global details such as international monetary flows and international stock markets. But I'm working on it. It's a life- long learning process. I'll keep you posted.


Friday, 4 January 2008 at 11h 45m 39s

J Edgar Hoover and Habeus Corpus

The New York Times reported that a newly declassified document shows that J. Edgar Hoover, longtime director of the FBI, had a plan to suspend habeas corpus and imprison some 12,000 Americans he suspected of disloyalty.

According to the declassified material, Hoover sent his plan to the White House on July 7, 1950. This was 12 days after the Korean War began. Hoover's plan called for putting suspect Americans in military prisons.

Hoover urged President Harry S. Truman to proclaim the mass arrests necessary to "protect the country against treason, espionage and sabotage." The FBI would "apprehend all individuals potentially dangerous" to national security. The arrests would be carried out under "a master warrant attached to a list of names" provided by the bureau. The names were part of an index Hoover had been compiling for years. "The index now contains approximately 12,000 individuals, of which approximately 97 percent are citizens of the United States," he wrote. "In order to make effective these apprehensions, the proclamation suspends the writ of habeas corpus."

Truman did declare a national emergency, but he had the great good sense to reject Hoover's advice for the United States to adopt one of the worst of communist characteristics -- to create an American gulag for thousands of people unfortunate enough to find their names on Hoover's lists.


[SOURCE:  | Capital Hill Blue | 3 January 2008  ]

Thank god for Harry Truman.

I was talking to a childhood friend this Xmas, and he was talking about how he thinks the government is preparing for an "incident" in which they intend to arrest a lot of people. He said that there are 2 books of names: the people arrested before the incident, and the people arrested after the incident. This is how the Nazi's took control between 1930 and 1939. Keep in mind that Hitler was technically elected.

Now I'm not as conspiratorially minded as my friend, but when you know the history of the past, J. Edgar Hoover in particular, you know that these deranged paranoid types exist -- even now. I've blogged about a lot of these trolls and ghouls in human form many times in the past. These iron-skin lizards live in the sheltered worlds of law offices, lobby firms, and think tanks bankrolled by a small number of irrational mean-spirited extremely wealthy people. They provide the money for the sadists and anti-democratic actions of the hirelings.

Two names you should look up : Norman Podhoretz (stess the "hor") and John Negropontes ("black layings"). The careers of both these men embody the paranoid sadist streak that permeates the minds of a small number of humankind throughout the length of history. From Caligula and Nero, to the Dark Czars of Russia, the dungeons of the Inquisition, and up to now, the possibility of individuals to break the social norms and yield to naked power is ever present. Only the strength of a people to resist dictates the extent in which they are permitted to thrive.


Friday, 4 January 2008 at 20h 7m 16s

The Winter storm hits

It is stormy as hell today. The entire city is littered with pieces and parts of trees from the winds gusting close to 50 mph at times. The lights were out at a lot of major intersects and the ticket riders wound up directing traffic in their raincoats. I had to go to 3 gas stations to find one that still had power.

The rain comes and goes in cycles between barely a drizzle and then a pelter of rain. The electricity is out in my neck of the woods, and right now I'm parked outside of Cafe Abir linking to their wi-fi network hoping the meter maid doesn't show up.


Friday, 4 January 2008 at 9h 30m 39s

The games played involve real people

Today Robert Pear at the New York Times writes about the Administration's unwillingness to subsidize the health care costs of working families with federal Medicaid funds, by insisting that states cannot fund families who are more than 250% of the poverty line.

The child health program complements Medicaid. Income limits vary from state to state and tend to cluster from 133 percent to 185 percent of the poverty level for Medicaid, with states allowed to go 50 percentage points higher for the child health program....Under the new policy, states must meet certain conditions if they want to cover children with family incomes above 250 percent of the poverty level. For example, a child who had private coverage in the past must be uninsured for at least one year before being enrolled in a state child health program.

Now why is this, you might ask. Here's the administration's reason: "Administration officials say government health programs start to “crowd out” private insurance when they cover families with incomes from 250 percent to 300 percent of the poverty level — about $51,600 to $62,000 for a family of four." This came out in an 17 August letter sent to all of the state Health Care Departments.
“The Aug. 17 letter is a CHIP policy, not a Medicaid policy,” said Mike Fogarty, chief executive of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority. “But it’s being applied in a much broader way. We are seeing many more roadblocks.” In addition, federal officials challenged Louisiana to explain why it did not want to enforce the one-year waiting period for children who had lost private health insurance because of a parent’s death or the failure of a business where a parent was employed. In such cases, the state replied, the loss of coverage is involuntary, and the waiting period would “penalize children and families for circumstances beyond their control.”

[SOURCE: Robert Pear | New York Times | 4 January 2007  ]

So the Administration is once again formulating and directing policy by rigidly interpreting the laws and using the power of the purse to enforce it's interpretations that are friendly to the behemoth of the insurance industry. "Crowding out" private insurance means not enabling private insurers to decide how much health-care they will pay for and at what price. Kids with asthma and other medical issues will cost a lot of money, and insurance companies don't want to pay that money. They want to filter their customers into different health-care criteria, and charge different prices, while not necessarily providing quality health-care, because private health insurance is first and foremost about making a huge profit. All else is secondary.

Now Republican wing-nuts would have you believe that competition will eschew the inefficient, bad health insurance companies. But insurance is not a grocery store. Insurance companies have to have a large amount of customers in order to be viable. Small companies cannot compete, and so what you have is a small number of very large companies who are actually competing for the business, and what they all do is "rationalize" the health-care payments they make in addition to deciding who to insure and what to insure.

The point is to make health care affordable and available for all people. The current system is inefficient because the health insurance market is innately inefficient absent government intrusion or regulation. Without Medicaid, Medicare, and the S-CHIP program, a lot of people who not have health insurance or receive health care at all. Hospital and doctor visits get avoided until the emergency health-care situation. The costs of the uninsured drive up the costs to those who can afford to pay for insurance, either with higher premiums or expensive hosptal costs (like, $800 a day beds and various fees). We are paying for this inefficient system of private health insurance.

This is what the Republicans and their Democratic enablers don't want to "crowd out."




GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS