frankilin roosevelt

It's not about being liberal or conservative anymore y'all. That is a hype offered by the fascist whores who want to confuse the people with lies while they turn this country into an aristocratic police state. Some people will say anything to attain power and money. There is no such thing as the Liberal Media, but the Corporate media is very real.



Check out my old  Voice of the People page.


Gino Napoli
San Francisco, California
High School Math Teacher

jonsdarc@mindspring.com




Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.

a middle-aged
George Washington



ARCHIVES
1074 POSTS
LATEST ITEM

June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
September 2014
August 2014
May 2014
March 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
August 2009
July 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

Thursday, 28 December 2006 at 11h 37m 29s

The real motives of Intelligent Design

Thom Hartmann (a Radio talk show host) talked about two interesting matters involving politics, science, nature and religion today. He talked about how intelligent design is really a religious belief, and the Theory of Evolution is a scientific fact based upon observable effects and predicable experimentation. Mutations and changes in the Earth's environment are cataclysmic events that result in some species being better adept to live by exploiting some available resource or method of obtaining such resource. Animals that specialized a method of eating and having off-spring have an very advantageous ability to live. However, when the environment or eco-system changes and these specialized methods are no longer effective, the species who cannot adapt die off.

Thusly, if we humans cannot change our methods of energy production we will destroy our ability to live here on Earth and die off, like the Dinosaurs before.

The beliefs called Intelligent design consist of the idea that some superior man-like being "intelligentally" watches over all events big and small, ascribing to all of the multitude of molecules, sub-atomic particles, planets, universes, and living things his very astute eye. The father with a thick grey beard -- or the loving earth mother -- watches over his many flocks, rewarding and punishing them, or pushing a little here, pulling back a little there, all day and night, 24-7. In short, God is a control freak that has his hand in everything that goes on for a higher "intelligent" purpose.

It must be remember firmly by all who have personal religious "spiritual" beliefs (like myself, and everyone else) that this "God" and the actions of "God" get interpreted by human beings. People who go around saying that "God" has spoken to them are viewed with suspicion for a reason. Why would "God" speak to some persons, but not everyone anyway; or if "God" does speak to everyone by actions, the interpretation or ramification of these actions and events still must come through mankind. These spokespersons for the Lord, or "prophets," are not always considered such by their contemporaries, and are only named "Prophets" after they are dead and history views them with better perspective. These "prophets" are also equated with social upheaval and political events that are rooted in a community of ideas and common issues. In short, religious faith and spiritual beliefs cannot be separate from the human society in which they evolve because their is no way to separate the actual God from the interpretations of men.

We cannot know what God's intentions are really. Certainly the course of action that is most beneficial to everyone would be the best action to take, but we modern-day persons assume an infinite wisdom and ageless perspective. The Gods of the ancients, and even some Christian religious sects, were jealous, whimsical, and wrathful beings. We humans cannot ever completely understand the workings of the Universe, and are only better equiped by the advanced technology of our machines. We analyze actions and reactions scientifically and observe phenomenom that we try to explain, with models that are usually better, but not anymore adequate to a complete understanding. However, to say that God is what lives in the vacant spaces of scientific knowledge is a very limited narrow-minded view of spirituality.

The belief that all things must happen for a purpose does not have to interfere with the scientific method. Nor does the scientific method obliterate the purpose of God and spirituality. Knowledge and understanding are intrinsic parts of spiritual awareness, and spirituality is not separate from the human culture and society from which it comes -- which is why there are and have been millions of religions across the world throughout the history of mankind.

What we have here is a political movement that is trying to foist confusion upon the ignorant masses who consider themselves religious folk. Lacking scientific knowledge these people are vulnerable to this foolishness because they don't have the knowledge to understand evolution, and thus can be persuaded to view evolution as something that is anti-religious and hedonistic. This is yet another battle in the age-old fight of "Faith" versus "Reason" by organized religion upon the universities, or the Protestants upon the Catholic monopoly in Europe, or the mandarins versus the clerics in China and the ancient world. Or in modern day language: obeying the hierarchy of officialdom versus thinking for yourself and being allowed to see the documents or here the ideas upon which all official decisions a based.


Friday, 22 December 2006 at 13h 37m 41s

Bush is nuts


They can't let go of the plan. Those 14 permanent military bases were meant to be the beginning of an invasion of Syria and then Iran. This is why Bush and the gang listen to no one. They are driven by their messianic conviction of the grand plan.

And today, in the San Francisco Comical (disgrace of a newspaper) all you got was a sloppy story about Bush's intentions to increase troops -- buttressed no less with the hack words of American Enterprise Institute, in the 4th paragraph. AEI is a lobbyist mill that is literally funded by a handfull of large corporate slush funds and a few paranoid multi-billionaires in order to sway public opinion by legitimizing untenable policy positions. Anything anyone quotes from "AEI" has no merit, unless the purpose is to create nuanced versions of news that informs the reader very little even though there are plenty of quotes.

And on page 12, the cut page of the story, at the top there is a photo. A good looking young marine kneeling down at the coffin of his boyhood friend.

What a pathetic appeal to maudlin patriotism. Do our boys a real service and tell the truth, instead of pasting together the scripted sound bytes of 3 or 4 public relations campaigns and the occasional edited quote of some chosen representative of the opposite opinion.

Bush has fired and replaced all the generals who don't tell him what he wants to hear. The pundits on the television said this action was like Lincoln who kept firing generals until he got a general who would successfully pursue the victory of the Union over the Confederacy. But exactly how is the American Civil War akin to an invasion of a foreign land and the defense of the 14 military bases from a native insurgency in the midst of a sectarian civil war.

The action of Bush firing his generals is more synonymous to Louis the Fourteenth firing his generals in the wake of the disaster of the war of Spanish Succession after France invaded Spain to secure the Spain crown, only to discover that the native resistance was cutting his troops to pieces, and that he couldn't fight a multi-front global war -- the American colonies and Spanish new world forces were indeed involved in this global war.

And did you see the tear drop on Georgie boy's eye that the chronicle offered. The subliminal message : Bush cares. Bull. Shit.

For instance: When has the damn Chronicle said or reported anything about :

  1. The 14 permanent military bases
  2. How local SF firm Bechtel skimmed government profits
  3. Who funds Governor Schwartzeneger (as in 1 million dollars from Chevron)
  4. Anything negative about silly smiley do-nothing photo-op mayor Gavin Newsom
  5. A story about the Bermuda Tax Havens used by more than 16,000 US businesses to avoid paying taxes
  6. How about the Centco British commander of Afghanistan who said in December that a disaster is imminent within 6 months?

Nothing. Instead, Bush is put into the frame of a man who cares, who makes thoughtful decisions, and admits to mistakes ... rather than a lying political operator whose purpose is to conceal the vile destructive corruption of the federal government and the militarization of all foreign policy.


Thursday, 21 December 2006 at 7h 1m 54s

A short poem at 5:47 am Pacific Coast Time


We are animals,
congealed molecules of life's plasma
that slither over the sculptured crevasses we call our world.

Satisfied with nothing,
we take pleasure like claiming luggage at the airport
knowing what is inside the suitcase
while hastily pacing to the taxicab waiting area outside the terminal.



Tuesday, 19 December 2006 at 22h 25m 3s

Happy Holidays


Wednesday, 13 December 2006 at 18h 1m 41s

My modus operandi

I often engage in blog commentary with a few political blogs. I suppose I'm something of a political junkie. It is an extension of my thirst for knowledge. I just have to know. I've always been this way.

Anyway, I made this fly-by statement in an evisceration of a troll who hangs out and makes stupid statements.


I only believe what is true. I can always prove that what I believe is true. If I am not sure about something, I will say so. If I am speculating (watch out, big word) I will say so.

And most importantly, on the odd occasion when I am wrong (it does happen) I will admit I am wrong, because the truth might be hard to accept, but it is far better to accept the truth than to lie to yourself and live in morbid denial of what is inescapably true.


The pursuit of truth and knowledge is neverending. We are on this Earth to achieve time to learn and understand, keeping the mantle of humanity burning. There is and never will become a point at which you can finally stop and say that you have achieved complete understanding. A so-called "expert" is really only a person who knows more than almost everyone else, or (in the case of math or sciences) makes the least amount of mistakes. Keep in mind that some people are amazingly encyclopedic in one or a few areas, but have scant details about much else.

It is impossible to learn everything, but you must still try.


Wednesday, 13 December 2006 at 19h 32m 27s

A primer about Salvadore Allende, Augustin Pinochet, and Chile

  1. Salvadore Allende
  2. School of the Americas ties with Pinochet
  3. more of the same
  4. School of the Americas
  5. A timeline of the Chilean coup d'etat

Chile is a long, thin country on the West side of the South American Andes mountains. It rises up more than half of the North-south distance of South America, and is actually the nation with the largest North-south distance in the world. Notice how the top of Chile is above Paraguay and Argentina.


Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 18h 3m 57s

Rummy, the Donald, AKA hypocrite

This is from thinkprogress.org, a site you must visit EVERYDAY. -----

In a new interview posted on Townhall.com, conservative columnist Cal Thomas asks outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, “With what you know now, what might you have done differently in Iraq?” Rumsfeld offers a remarkable response:

I don’t think I would have called it the war on terror. I don’t mean to be critical of those who have. Certainly, I have used the phrase frequently. Why do I say that? Because the word ‘war’ conjures up World War II more than it does the Cold War. It creates a level of expectation of victory and an ending within 30 or 60 minutes of a soap opera. It isn’t going to happen that way. Furthermore, it is not a ‘war on terror.’ Terror is a weapon of choice for extremists who are trying to destabilize regimes and (through) a small group of clerics, impose their dark vision on all the people they can control.

Leaving aside the fact that Rumsfeld himself used the phrase "war on terror" a number of times (follow the link): remember, these people describe themselves everytime they describe the "enemy."

Here is the poignant quote : "Terror is a weapon of choice for extremists who are trying to destabilize regimes and (through) a small group of clerics, impose their dark vision on all the people they can control."

Ah ha. The corporate fascist clique uses false flag operations as a "weapon of choice" in order to "destabilize" the democracy of the United States, all of this done by the "small group" of neo-con "clerics" who impose their strategic plans "on all the people they can control."

Amazing. Isn't it.

Read Wayne Madsen in the blog list on the right side. He is an ex-Naval Officer ex-NSA government bureaucrat who blew the whistle on the Navy's colussion with the NSA via spy ships back in the early 1980's. When you have to read this site, you have to keep in mind that this is a government insider with contacts inside the government. He should be considered the honest version of the report.


Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 19h 22m 25s

Did you hear this in the news?

Did you hear this in the news today?

[translated from the French, in Le Monde]


On Sunday , 10th December, the Iraqi President, Jalal Talabani, strongly rejected the compromise with Iraq mentioned in the report put out by Baker- Hamilton commission, and considered that "it undermines the sovereignty of Iraq."

Mr. Talabani judged the text injust. "It contains dangerous articles which undermine the sovereignty of Iraq. I reject the report in it's entirety," he affirmed. Mr. Talabani notably denounced the proposal to imply that the fall of the Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein had something to do with the current political process in Iraq, which according to him, "asserts itself against the long history of the Iraqi people rising up against the dictator."


Le Monde is the Corporate paper in France. You have to read it with care because the story quite often gets craftily edited and blemished with non-quoted attributions to amorphous persons like "some people" or "according to some" , for example.


Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 18h 42m 32s

Today's word is ...

cogent (adj.) : forcefully convincing. Pertaining to making a sequence of statements in such a manner that anyone listening would have no choice but to agree.

Examples :

  1. A cogent point.
  2. He cogently decimated his philosophy like a watchmaker dismantling a clock.


Saturday, 9 December 2006 at 12h 28m 58s

Bush listens to no one

except those voices in his head that he calls God.

After rejecting the Baker Iraq War Commission's suggestions, President Bush appears to have created his own commission within the military lead by General Pace, in which ... (hold on tight) ... they actually suggest an increase in order to attempt a final complete take-over of Baghdad.

"Bush listens to nobody. If he is not listening to James Baker, he is listening to nobody. This is a lesson for everyone. If you can't learn this lesson watching this, you are not paying attention. He listens to nobody."

--Sidney Blumenthal, on Sam Seder Show | 8 December 2006.


Good God almighty. The son rejects everyone in the status quo foreign policy establishment. What is next.




GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS