frankilin roosevelt

It's not about being liberal or conservative anymore y'all. That is a hype offered by the fascist whores who want to confuse the people with lies while they turn this country into an aristocratic police state. Some people will say anything to attain power and money. There is no such thing as the Liberal Media, but the Corporate media is very real.



Check out my old  Voice of the People page.


Gino Napoli
San Francisco, California
High School Math Teacher

jonsdarc@mindspring.com




Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.

a middle-aged
George Washington



ARCHIVES
1092 POSTS
LATEST ITEM

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
September 2014
August 2014
May 2014
March 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
August 2009
July 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

Wednesday, 22 November 2006 at 17h 22m 40s

The Florida Congressional election in district 13

Click here for the story in the Orlando Sentinel.

The Republican Vern Buchanan beats the Democratic candidate Christine Jennings by 369 votes in the Florida Congression election for district 13, despite the strange occurrence of 17,846 voters who voted but didn't cast a vote in the Congressional election.

From the Orlando Sentinel article source:


The Sentinel reviewed records of 17,846 touch-screen ballots that included no vote in the tightly contested 13th District congressional race to determine whom voters selected in other major races.

The analysis of the so-called "undervotes" examined the races for U.S. Senate, governor, attorney general, chief financial officer and agriculture commissioner.

The results showed that the undervoted ballots skewed Democratic in all of those races, even in the three races in which the county as a whole went Republican. In the governor's race, for example, Republican Charlie Crist won handily in Sarasota, easily beating Democrat Jim Davis. But on the undervoted ballots, Davis finished ahead by almost 7 percentage points.

In the agriculture commissioner's race, Republican Charles Bronson beat Copeland by a double-digit margin among all voters. But on the undervoted ballots, Copeland won by about 3 percentage points.

Some questions remain

The analysis does not -- and cannot -- reveal why no congressional choice was recorded on the ballots. It also cannot determine which candidate any single voter might have selected had he or she made a choice.

But the strong performance of other Democrats indicates Jennings would have found a sizable number of supporters within the group.


My question is this: how many other races were "undervoted" ? These are voters who bothered to show up and vote, but neglected to cast a vote in the Congressional election. Eighteen thousand ? Does that make sense to you? It makes no sense to me, unless something funny is going on.


Wednesday, 22 November 2006 at 16h 41m 37s

Bush twin Barbara robbed in Argentina

Click here for the story. You'll have to read Spanish.


Tuesday, 21 November 2006 at 20h 8m 13s

The food you eat

Nowadays, none of us have any clue what it is we are actually eating. Tandem with a lack of knowledge about nutrition, science, and biology, most people do not understand the basics of physiological processes, and are easily enticed by something that tastes good.

For instance, a lot of people don't understand that white flour and white sugar are both washed over with ammonia -- to separate the molasses in the latter case, and to make the flour look white or "bleached." Tomatoes -- assuming they are not genetically modified (or organic) are sprayed with pesticides, picked while they are green, and then blasted with Xenon gas just before they are shipped. Most of the corn used as filler -- or from which corn syrup is made -- is genetically modified with a gene from an E-Coli bacterum, so that the corn can either secrete its own pesticide, or so the corn can take twice the rate of pesticide treatment. Milk is ladden with all sorts of residues, gbH hormones, anti-biotics, and pus from the industrialized udders of the cows that get infections from the hyperstress the drugs cause. Since the cows also eat genetically modified food, the diet of the cow is not natural at all. This applies to all products derived from the milk -- like cheese and butter. Margarine is not butter, and is actally one hydrogen-carbon molecule different from plastic.

All of these products -- and don't get me started on fast food -- enter into the body, and have to be dealt with by the body. Our body is filled with chemicals : enzymes and Hydro-chloric acid to break down food, hormones secreted by glands to regulate body processes, vitamins, proteins and fatty acids that are just prototypes of the molecules that help form body cells and make energy to fuel cell activity. Anything that is "foreign" to the body is either toxic, virulent, or benign to the body, but the body treats everything as a threat -- which puts the bodies immune system on hyper-drive. The pancreas also has to deal with added pressures of digesting food that has no enzymes to aide in the digestion, and also has regulate insulin production more often because of the increase sugar load from the foods we eat. In most fast food meat products, phosphates are added to the meat to keep the product together. Phosphates in the blood-stream have the same effect on roaming cholesterol, sticking to them and forming platelets.

The long-term problem of 30 plus years of this type of food could very well explain why Americans have twice the rate of Heart-Attacks and Diabetes cases then anywhere else in the world.

You really are what you eat.


Tuesday, 21 November 2006 at 17h 18m 4s

Kissinger, to the rescue

Those who willfully act without sufficient preliminary investigation are like proud savages jumping out of airplanes without first checking to see if the plane is on the ground.

Or, when all else fails, send corporate petro-chemical-defense industry lackey Henry Kissenger to Britain on Sunday to say Victory in Iraq is impossible. Yep, after 40 years of being corrupted by the millions of retainer fees he gets for "consulting" with corporate elites, it is Kissenger who is sent to cozy up with the international press, which is kind of like sending Al Capone to speak with the London Press about Tax Evasion.


Here ... I have come ... To ... Save ... The ... Day.

Nowadays I have to squelch my desire to scream at the flag-waivers who jumped on this ship of patriotism, and are so quick to jump off. Most of us never got on that ship, because we did our homework and saw the lies. We tried to tell you, but all we got was your irate insistence and blithe righteousness.

And now thanks to you, we have not only lost control of the region, but also respect. We have pissed away money that got stolen by friends of elites, and will get nothing for the billions of tax payer dollars. Reconstruction never happen, and was half-assed whereever it was even attempted. We have forsaken all future contracts, which are now going to Europe, Russia, and China. Our selective intransigence about regime change brands us as selfish hypocrites,because we support nearby dictatorships in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Equitorial Guinea, Uzbekistan, and Malaysia when they suit our interest.

If you want to drown in the frozen hell of stupidity, go for it. But don't expect me or anyone else that thinks to join you.


Friday, 17 November 2006 at 18h 28m 53s

Keith Olbermann on the mark, again

Olbermann: "Funny, how when Trent Lott defeated Lamar Alexander by one vote for the Senate minority leadership yesterday, it was characterized in the media as a remarkable comeback story, with the random kidding reference to that ironical word “minority.” But when Steny Hoyer and Jack Murtha both stood for the House majority leadership today, that was characterized in the media as Democratic infighting, with frequent implications that the Dems were already coming apart at the seams."


Thursday, 16 November 2006 at 17h 17m 13s

True sight of the people

“A little patience, and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve and the people, recovering their true sight, restore their government to its true principles.”

-—Thomas Jefferson, on the Alien & Sedition Act, June 4, 1798.


Tuesday, 14 November 2006 at 20h 20m 56s

My take on the Time cover

Here is my spoof of the recent pitiful Time magazine cover that I discussed in one yesterday's posts.


Monday, 13 November 2006 at 17h 36m 8s

Leonardo puts his money to use

Click here to visit Leonardo di Caprio's website where he posts 2 online movies. One about Global Warming and one about the earth's water supplies.

Wow.


Monday, 13 November 2006 at 18h 7m 21s

The tale of two covers and 12 years

  Which cover of Time occurred in 2006 ?
  Which cover in 1994 ?


The current meme of the 2006 election by the corporate media has been to equate the Democratic onslaught with the rise of true conservatism. This makes no sense, but then the corporate media is the manipulated vocal box of absentee owners and the financial classes who want to salvage as much of the discredited agenda as possible while denying the dismise of conservative governing policy. Not one Democratic office holder lost one seat in every election last Tuesday, both state and federal. The majority of governors (28 to 24) are now Democratic. Democrats either won or keep their seat. Republicans either held their seat or lost.

Or, as Maureen Dowd aptly said in a recent column:

"Republicans were oddly oblivious to the fact that they had turned into an unappetizing tableau of bloated, corrupt, dissembling, feckless white hacks who were leaving kids unprotected. DeLay and Bob Ney sneaking out of Congress with dollar bills flying out of their pockets. Hastert playing Cardinal Bernard Law, shielding Mark Foley. Rummy, cocky and obtuse as he presided over an imploding Iraq, while failing to give soldiers the armor, support and strategy they needed to come home safely. Cheney, vowing bullheadedly to move full speed ahead on Iraq no matter what the voters decided. W. frantically yelling about how Democrats would let the terrorists win, when his lame-brained policies had spawned more terrorists."

In other words, they started believing in their own spin. Every dirty trick they tried turned against them this election cycle. Voter turnout increased by 10% (from 45% to 55%) with the increase being predominantly younger voters. The turnout of younger voters increased by 25%. According to Thom Hartmann (and the exit poll data he cites) every federal election was within 1% of the exit poll data except in Montana and Virginia, where they were off by 4% or more -- which means the obvious. However, Thom believes (and I do too) that the increased voter turnout made it too difficult for the Republicans to steal the election this time, even though both Montana and Virginia were extremely close.

Exit polls are never wrong by more than 1% unless there is deliberate malfeasance and tampering. Ignorant persons and political jackals will try to think otherwise, but exit polls are never wrong by more than 1% unless there is deliberate malfeasance and tampering. For the last 30 years, in Germany, exit polls determine the election winners -- unless the victory is within 1%. After 2 weeks all of the paper ballots are counted, AND THE ELECTION RESULTS ARE NEVER MORE THAN 0.5% OFF. Exit polls are accurate because people are stating something they just did, rather than something they say they will do in the future. Exit polls only came into discredit since 1998 when they started to differ from the tally results of electronic voting machines.

Which again, means the obvious. Throw away the touch screen voting machines. Use ballots and electronic scanners so there is a paper trail. Then enforce exit polling and ballot sampling techniques ( examining a small sample ) to ensure the reliability of the scanners and central tabulators.

How come the media isn't educating the public correctly on this issue? Well, do you really think the corporate media has an interest in an informed, educated voting population?

According to the exit polls, the top five issues this election cycle were :

  1. Corruption
  2. Iraq
  3. Education
  4. Health Care
  5. Economy

Yea, I know, what are they talking about?

Ezra Klein demolishes the conservative victory hypothesis in a recent article in the American Prospect online edition. Click here.

I like this picture better ...



So here you have Time magazine -- which is but one small branch of the monolithic enterprise Time Warner Inc. -- equating the 2006 Democratic sweep as two large equal sized circles overlapping a little in the middle. Whereas in 1994, the Elephant takes up to 65% of the paper squashing a small donkey underneath its front foot, with the title "GOP Stampede" at the top.

Here are the two election victories in both years.

1994 : Republicans gained 52 House, 8 Senate, and 10 gubernatorial seats
2006 : Democrats gained 33 House, 6 Senate, and 6 gubernatorial seats

Obviously the 1994 take-over by the Rethuglicans was a brutal stampede -- a perfect example of what happens when the voters choices are Republican and Republican-lite : no one votes but Republican voters. Yet how come the editors of Time choose to represent a Democratic sweep as abstract geometrical concepts and nuanced vocabulary terms like "center" ? Why are they NOW suddenly so concerned about partisanship when they were partisan biased for the last decade? They could have done a story about the "new Democrats" with 6 to 11 of the freshmen Democrats that beat Republicans in Congress.

Ah, but what better way to hide the faces of the new Democrats than behind a color blue and the Republicans underneath the color red. It's two circles not a Donkey and an Elephant. The percentages of the circle colors is even wrong. The percentages of Republican(red) to Democrat(blue) to Independent(purple) is 33% to 38% to 29% -- the purple section should be much larger !

Something like this


Saturday, 11 November 2006 at 12h 47m 35s

Honoring our veterans of foreign wars




GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS