... or at least my own |
April 29, 2002
Cohesion For me, the world's most pressing problem, is the search for cohesion and
togetherness. The forces of visual electronic media have unleashed changes over
the last 100 years that are not different than those of environmental and
societal changes caused by war and/or disease. These forces have dramatized
social interaction beyond subconsciousness, creating interconnected neurotic
insecurities by offering massive waves of life by the minute to put into deep
storage reference. They have broadcast 5 second gossip "bites" into trivial
weightlessness so that the minds of participants are welded with unanalyzed
phrases. And by causing an observer to become entranced (for whatever reason)
these forces render our thought processes unimportant. Notice I didn't say "non-existent." The essence of the human mind is the
automatic creation of thoughts. We are supposed to be inherently aware of our
immediate environment. What television does however is train us to stop
thinking. We are trained to "listen" and "imbibe" rapid fire sounds and fleeting
images. Since the mind responds at a subconscious level, we come to watch so
much that we "get used to it." We come to accept statements and pictures without
wondering or even considering their origins. We become submerged in a consumer
ethos, an icon swimming in a sea of "big deals" and golly-gee fashion models
trying to be cool and live the life just like a melange of one million
advertisements. This experience is not a harmless facade because every piece of
the electronic media is penetrated with commercialism, even the sanctity of the
truth we call news. A Baptist minister would say, "You cannot save the devil. Don't let him into
your house." The dissolution of the community begins with withdrawal of societies
individuals into self-created techno-worlds. The recent hegemony of the
electronic network has a multiple of social and political implications, and we
will have to recognize this reality. A society that calls itself a democracy
will evolve into slavery when the individuals of the democracy lose
responsibility for inter-communication. Tyranny will arise if you sit at home
pampered by the mega-billion media conglomerates version of reality brought to
you by mannequins in nice clothes who read off scrolls. We will lose our voice
as a people, because our freedoms will become replaced by the rule of law. The
next 100 years will be a challenge for ourselves as a nation and as individuals.
I say this because the nature of mankind's relationship with technology and
machinery is evolving new ways to interact with people. Ideas of leisure and the
means with which we go about our lives, the materials we use, the books we read,
the nature of our conversations, the philosophies we are exposed to, the very
images that course through our minds are more influenced by electronic parades
created by well-funded organizations. The very word "entertainment" is
misleading since this accepted experience of everyday normal people occurs when
regarding a static replay-able capture of life that has been rehearsed and
edited. Time itself has been denuded. Every day is compartmentalized into
impermeable slices called seconds which are added together in groups of 60 to
create what are called minutes. At each node in this sequential arrangement a
moment exists at every spot in the world to be recorded as audio and video. Yet
how can the "nightly news" effectively portray the lump sum of the world's nodes
in any 24 hour period? There is no conspiracy, but the result is still the same.
Now for the crescendo .... do you hear it? Let me plug in the CD player. Eroding the communal ethos leaves a huge void that becomes filled with the
speeches, dramas, and romances of sit-com-hollywood-super video cam USA [insert
laugh track here.] What does this mean to life in such a manufactured society ?
Certainly we will be challenged on how to identify ourselves separately from the
impressions formed in our mind by pundits, actors, and actresses whom we will
never meet. Our logic may become reversed so that we will be tempted to gain
acceptance by repetition, and understand success in terms of acquisition. But
the greatest challenge for any society is the ability of that society to make
decisions. How will the social traditions of our society be challenged by an
economic order which posits rampant consumerism above community? If a people are
weaned and bred on ignorance and lies, what possibilities exist for political
change when our country needs it most ? If the people are angry, resentful, and
afraid ... how will we respond when our awareness is convoluted with deception?
We live in interesting times. |