frankilin roosevelt

It's not about being liberal or conservative anymore y'all. That is a hype offered by the fascist whores who want to confuse the people with lies while they turn this country into an aristocratic police state. Some people will say anything to attain power and money. There is no such thing as the Liberal Media, but the Corporate media is very real.

Check out my old  Voice of the People page.

Gino Napoli
San Francisco, California
High School Math Teacher

Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.

a middle-aged
George Washington

1493 POSTS

February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
September 2014
August 2014
May 2014
March 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
August 2009
July 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

Saturday, 31 May 2008 at 9h 15m 52s

Richard Clarke speaks ... again

Will anyone listen this time? Or watch American idol instead?

Click here for the podcast

Clarke talks about his recent book "Your Government Failed You." He was the counter-terrorism chief from Reagan to Dubya Bush, and resigned in disgust in March 2003 because he is a patriotic american. He talks about how bin laden was allowed to escape at Tora Bora by direct intervention from Centcom. He talks about how General Franks and Rumsfeld refused to allowed government oversight into their military operations. He talks about how purposely bungled the department of Homeland Security has become, and how it is just a cash cow for political operators and government contractors that get paid even though their projects don't get completed.

This won't be on the history channel.

Saturday, 31 May 2008 at 8h 58m 6s

Hillary is trying to strip Texas delegates

Here is yet another reason why I have become disgusted with Hillary Clinton. I quote from John Aravosis, because he says what I feel.

Hillary Clinton, champion of the blue collar, Jack Daniels' drinking woman is now trying to unseat delegates in Texas. You see, you can't claim that the only reason you're still in the race, after you lost, is because you want to see every vote counted, and then repeatedly try to stop people from having their vote count in Texas and Nevada, for starters. That makes you a hypocrite. It makes you an opportunist. And it makes you a liar. It makes you every nasty thing that the Republicans have said about you for years. Please stop proving them right.

[SOURCE:  | | 29 May 2008]
[SOURCE:  | | 30 May 2008]

Saturday, 31 May 2008 at 8h 44m 4s

How Florida and Michigan happened

Before the media starts re-writing history again, and before the ignorant masses start believing the re-writes, let's all collectively remember how the Michigan and Florida primary mess happened.

From John Aravosis at America Blog:

The DNC sanctioned Florida on August 25, 2007 by stripping away its delegates. That made it painfully clear what would happen to any state that moved its primary up in violation of DNC rules. So what does Michigan do one week later, on September 4, 2007? Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat, signs a law establishing their January 15th primary, in violation of DNC rules. Michigan knew exactly what was going to happen if they broke the rules, they just watched Florida lose its delegates one week earlier, and they did it anyway. And now they're acting all surprised.

There really are some atrocious issues underlying this entire conflict.

1. Florida and Michigan Democrats were complicit in all of this. This wasn't something the Republicans forced on them - they wanted to break the rules, and they did.

2. Florida and Michigan knew in advance that they'd lose their delegates if they moved their primaries up. They didn't care.

3. The reason we have these rules, the reason we have these sanctions, is to protect the primary process, and in particular to protect the first-in-the-nation status of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. If FL and MI are let off the hook, as Hillary is proposing, then there are no rules, and we'll have a free-for-all the next time around when every state keeps moving their primaries up and up and up until we have non-stop primaries for 4 years.

Saturday, 31 May 2008 at 8h 30m 52s

McCain quotes

Here's a few choicey quotes from the man with military know-how and expertise:

  • "But the fact is, I think we could go in with much smaller numbers than we had to do in the past. But any military man worth his salt is going to have to prepare for any contingency, but I don't believe it's going to be nearly the size and scope that it was in 1991." -- John McCain, September 15, 2002.
  • "Absolutely. Absolutely,"says John McCain, when asked by Chris Matthews, "[Do] you believe that the people of Iraq or at least a large number of them will treat us as liberators?" -- March 12, 2003.
  • "[There] there "are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods, today." says John McCain, after touring a Baghdad market wearing a bulletproof vest and guarded by "100 American soldiers, with three Blackhawk helicopters, and two Apache gunships overhead -- April 1, 2007.

You'll have to check out the full link to read the compiled list.

[SOURCE: Jon Perr | | 27 May 2008]

Saturday, 31 May 2008 at 8h 19m 56s

More hypocrisy

McCain uses a General Petraeus in a fundraising photo and fills his campaign team with lobbyists, while also pretending he's an independent maverick. Now it seems that McCain is putting up billboard advertisements with "West Point Grads for McCain" as the caption.

Hmmm...Paid for and approved by West Point Grads for McCain. Okay, so a few super gung-ho patriots think McCain is the man to lead the nation down the path towards World War Three. Wowwie-zowwie.

There is a problem with this ad however, as Cliff Schecter points out:

It seems just two years ago West Point sued another group also calling themselves "West Point Grads" who were in fact anti-war, claiming trademark violation over use of the name West Point.

The above "West Point Grads" were not partisan. The McCain Campaign is. So it's a trademark violation when a progressive group uses "West Point Grads," but when it is partisan Republicans, it's a-ok with West Point.

[SOURCE: Cliff Schecter | | 30 May 2008]

Here's the 2006 lawsuit the United States Government pursued against the anti-war group.

The United States Military Academy, a/k/a, the United States Government, a/k/a the citizens of the United States are suing a group of West Point graduates who have organized against the Iraq War to prevent their use of the “West Point” name.

The Army warned an anti-war group of former U.S. Military Academy cadets to stop using the words “West Point” in its name, saying they are trademarked. A co-founder of West Point Graduates Against the War countered Friday that his organization is simply following the cadets’ code. “At West Point, we were taught that cadets do not lie, cheat or steal — and to oppose those who do,” said William Cross, a 1962 West Point graduate. “We are a positive organization. We are not anti-West Point or anti- military. We are just trying to uphold what we were taught.”

West Point spokesman Lt. Col. Kent Cassella said the academy sent the April 12 warning letter because the group failed to go through a licensing process to get permission to use the term “West Point.” The group’s anti-war stance is irrelevant, he said. “This is not a political issue. They did not ask for permission. We are doing what any college or university would do to enforce its trademarks,” Cassella said.

The Army registered the words “West Point” — as well as “United States Military Academy,” “USMA,” and “U.S. Army” — as trademarks in 2000 to control their use on educational material and commercial goods.

An attorney hired by Cross and his colleagues said the warning raises questions of First Amendment speech protection and selective enforcement. Joseph Heath said he noted the concerns in a response sent to the Army on Monday; he has not yet received a reply, he said.

[SOURCE: James Joyner | | 6 May 2006]

Sunday, 18 May 2008 at 9h 1m 24s

News agency polls in perspective

I was reading the Mad Biologist today, and he mentioned that he thought the news agencies should release their poll data. There was a comment to the blog that I found interesting, so I thought I'd share it.

  [SOURCE: Mad Biologist | ]

I work at a call centre where we conduct these sorts of polls. Most of our clients are businesses wanting to gather information on the success of their advertising, opinions on future advertising, or what people think of their competitors. Every so often, however, we do get work from news and government agencies looking to gather this sort of stuff.

I must say that most of the questions are very loaded and it usually becomes fairly obvious to me who is sponsoring the poll. Worse than that, most of these polls are just advertisements in disguise. The way that the questions are worded makes it almost impossible for the respondent to do anything but agree. The idea behind it is either that if you repeat something to someone enough times, they start to believe it, or that if you present poll results that show that 90% of people agree with X, people who don't agree with X start to feel as though they are missing something and become more open to the possibility of agreeing with X.

The people who write these polls can make the results say whatever they want them to, even on the level of the data. So my point in all of this is just to say that the interpretation of the data you are getting from the news agencies is probably about as accurate as the data itself. What you want is the data AS WELL as the scripts that were used to gather it.

And remember that the sample used to collect this data is a list of publically phone numbers. Not cell phones and unlisted telephone numbers. The time's when the phone calls are also placed are between 5pm and 8pm for most polls.

Now when you get samples from a large population you first have to analyze who might be excluded, because the sample will not be representative of the larger population UNLESS each member of the larger population is equally likely to be selected.

So who is being excluded? People with unlisted phone numbers. People who don't answer their phones. People who tend to go outside or don't go home after work People who use their cell phones as their primary source of phone calls.

What these polls are sampling are the people who are home that answer their publically listed telephone number. These people are probably home because they watch a lot of television. So what these polls actually measure is the effectiveness of the media spin machine. Pump out the propaganda and then follow up with polls until the desired results appear.

Sunday, 18 May 2008 at 8h 33m 10s

Ancient microbes will accelerate Global Climate Change

The Northern Hemisphere is covered with millions of acres of Permafrost. Until the last 100 years, Northern Canada and Siberian Russia stayed frozen almost all year long, and the ground 4 feet below the surface stayed frozen. That has changed. And this is going to release the microbes that feed on the dead mammoth carcasses at a rate which will increase the release of methane gases faster than can be controlled, because the microbes will all become alive and start expelling methane.

Here is Russian scientist Sergei Zimov.

Russian scientist, Sergei Zimov, has been studying climate change in Russia's Arctic for 30 years now. He is worried that as this organic matter becomes exposed to the air it will drastically accelerate global warming predictions even beyond some of the most pessimistic forecasts.

"This will lead to a type of global warming which will be impossible to stop," he said.

According to Zimov, when the organic matter left behind by mammoths and other wildlife is exposed to the air by the thawing permafrost, microbes that have been dormant for thousands of years will spring back into action. They’ll begin once again to emit carbon dioxide and methane gas as a by-product. Zimov says thought the microbes are tiny, they will start emitting these gases in enormous quantities simply because there will be a lot of them.

Yakutia is a region in the north-eastern corner of Siberia, where a belt of permafrost contains the mammoth-era soil. It covers an area roughly the size of France and Germany combined. There is even more of it elsewhere in Siberia.

"The deposits of organic matter in these soils are so gigantic that they dwarf global oil reserves," Zimov said. U.S. government statistics show mankind emits about 7 billion tons of carbon a year."Permafrost areas hold 500 billion tons of carbon, which can fast turn into greenhouse gases," Zimov added. "If you don't stop emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere ... the Kyoto Protocol (an international pact aimed at reducing greenhouse emissions) will seem like childish prattle."

[SOURCE: Casey Kazan | Daily Galaxy | 15 May 2008]

Sunday, 18 May 2008 at 8h 16m 1s

The bush media covers his ass once again

So Bush stands in front of the Israeli legislature and accuses Obama of being an appeaser when he wants to have talks with Iran. Meanwhile, Bush's own Defense Secretary Robert Gates has a speech that says

that the United States needs to "sit down and talk with" Iran. Not only that, Gates added, "We can't go to a discussion and be completely the demander."

Now of course the media jumped all over this extreme contradiction and disgusting display of dissolute hypocrisy. Wrong.

Here is Jamison Foster at Media Matters

Instead, much of the news media got busy pretending the Post article didn't exist and that Gates had not undermined Bush's political attack on Obama. Instead, many news outlets simply rushed to repeat Bush's assault over and over again, as though it had merit.

A quick look at ABC's The Note -- which claims for itself the responsibility for providing "editorial guidance on the leading political stories of the day" -- demonstrates how thoroughly Gates' comments were ignored in coverage of Bush's attack. Yesterday's edition of The Note didn't mention either Bush's comments (which came after The Note was finished) or Gates'. But a later posting did devote 341 words to Bush's criticism of Obama without bothering to mention Gates' comments about meeting with Iran. Today, The Note included 560 words about Bush's remarks -- but still no mention of Gates....

But the most striking disappearance of Gates' comments came on CNN. On yesterday's American Morning, host John Roberts interviewed Obama communications director Robert Gibbs. Gibbs twice brought up Gates' comments -- though when CNN aired clips of the interview later in the day, the cable network edited Gibbs' comments to include the sentence before he mentioned Gates, and the sentence after he mentioned Gates -- but to omit any reference to the defense secretary.

Here's what Gibbs actually said, which CNN did air in its entirety the first time:

GIBBS: Obviously this is an unprecedented political attack on foreign soil. It's quite frankly sad and astonishing that the president of the United States would politicize the 60th anniversary of Israel with a false political attack. I assume he also is going to come home and fire his secretary of defense who was quoted in The Washington Post just yesterday saying we need to figure -- quote, "We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage and then sit down and talk with them." Them being Iran. Look, we have come to expect, and we've seen from this administration over the last eight years this type of cowboy diplomacy. Again, we've come to expect it. But over the past eight years it's made this country far less safe than we were.

But twice during the day, CNN again aired that clip of Gibbs -- except that it edited out the portion in bold, in which Gibbs pointed out the Bush administration's hypocrisy. Several other times, CNN aired a portion of Gibbs' comments, without the references to Gates.

[SOURCE: Jamison Foster | Media Matters | 16 May 2008]

Your media professionals at work again.

Saturday, 17 May 2008 at 8h 43m 42s

About those employment numbers again

"Companies did not cut as many positions as expected, they cut the hours instead. The average work week plunged 0.3% (and, aggregate hours worked were down at an annual rate of 1% in the past three months), which, by the way, would be the equivalent of 400,000 job cuts.

This is a sign that labor market conditions and domestic demand are far softer than the headline suggests. What drives consumer spending inevitably is income growth. Average weekly earnings fell 0.2% sequentially in April in what was the largest decline in two years. This dragged the year-on-year rate down to 3.1% from 3.3% in March, 3.7% in February and the nearby peak of 3.8% posted last November in what is clear disinflationary trend in wages.

The rebound in the Household survey was all in part-time employment. While there was a nice rebound in the Household Survey, it was all in part-time employment – that is not the driver of confidence and spending. Growth in full-time jobs is what drives those things. And, full-time employment actually fell 375,000 in April and is down 572,000 year-to-date; of the folks who were working part-time in April, the number doing so because of “economic reasons” (mostly slack business conditions) surged 306,000 or 6.3% – again the steepest runup in two years. The diffusion indices fell through the floor to 45.4 in April from 48 in March – this measures the share of industries adding to payrolls and shows that even though the headline job loss was lower than expected, the decline was very broadly based across sectors.

[SOURCE: David Rosenberg | Merrill Lynch | ]

hat-tip to Barry Ritholtz at thebigpicture blog

You should click the source link and read further. Rosenberg "debunks" 5 myths:

  1. The first quarter GDP report says no recession
  2. The April employment report was benign
  3. The Fed is done and the next move is to hike
  4. The credit crunch is over
  5. Housing looks set to stabilize

You see, when you manage the portfolios of billions of dollars, you have to be honest. The television talking heads are for the useful idiots. The elites don't listen to the hired hacks who promote Walt Disney World economics for the lower classes.

Sunday, 11 May 2008 at 9h 32m 25s

Insanity at work in the Bush Justice Department

(WASHINGTON) — The Bush administration on Friday urged a federal appeals court to stop meatpackers from testing all their animals for mad cow disease, but a skeptical judge questioned whether the government has that authority.

The government seeks to reverse a lower court ruling that allowed Arkansas City, Kan.-based Creekstone Farms Premium Beef to conduct more comprehensive testing to satisfy demand from overseas customers in Japan and elsewhere. Less than 1 percent of slaughtered cows are currently tested for the disease under Agriculture Department guidelines. The agency argues that more widespread testing does not guarantee food safety and could result in a false positive that scares consumers.

"They want to create false assurances," Justice Department attorney Eric Flesig-Greene told a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

[SOURCE: Sam Hannel | Time | 9 May 2008]

Did you catch that quote from Justice D attorney Flesig? "THEY WANT TO CREATE FALSE ASSURANCES."

Oh so testing cows to help get a contract from Japanese customers is creating false assurances? Why is the Justice Department even involved in this case? You would think the federal government would want to be helping to develop the trade of meat with foreign nations rather that represent the short-sided, narrow-minded interests of large corporate bean counters who refuse to spend any money at all, even if it benefits their long-term interests.

This is where the need for federal subsidization comes in. If businesses won't (or can't because their profit margins are too thin) invest money to aide their long term business trends, the government should provide the funds.