Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.
|Monday, 23 June 2008 at 23h 53m 45s|
Shakespeare wrote ...
Trust a few
Do wrong to none.
Sometimes it only takes nine words to state a life's statement succinctly.
|Monday, 23 June 2008 at 19h 29m 28s|
A LOVE LETTER
I am not the one you are searching for. That person is just a dream you like to
hold onto, and all those whom you thought resembled the picture were only accessories
to the illusions, helping you believe fairy tales and stories about superheroes
that either saved you from complete apathetic boredom, or allowed you to forget
about your tortured soul for a brief moment of time.
And when the inescapable truth comes, when the imperfections of the charade come
crashing down like the next wave on the nudist beach, you will blame the statues
you have placed in the sky, who could never live up to the expectations.
But it is your own fault, because love cannot be found in the places where you seek.
What you really want is a savior. You have no idea what love is, or could be, because
you are too self-absorbed about issues of personal inadequacy and delusions of grandeur.
You see, love is everywhere, and resides even now, within your own heart. Unfortunately,
you confuse love with a solution, and you want someone special out there in the
universe to make you feel unique and special, when you already are unique and special.
You just think having someone hold you and tell you the magic words is more powerful,
like a drug addict who cannot live happily in the moment without imbibing the deadly
You already have love, you cannot find it. Love is who you are. Love is what you
pay attention to, what you occupy your thoughts with, and what you share with everyone,
but you want to make distinctions so you can achieve self-satisfaction through some
role-playing game you call romance with those individuals who don't challenge
you on your insecurity issues. Love for you is just the path of least resistance.
It isn't anything actually deep, meaningful, or profound. It's just a poker
game with people who show you the cards you want to see while they keep their stratagems
and fears close to the chest.
Love doesn't play games with 52 cards, or strategize how to win over another
soul's heart. Love is something you have already, that is either recognized
or shared, or is ignored and kept in safe-deposit box. Love isn't a quick fix
at the 24 hour drive-thru burger joint. Love is endlessly nourishing, and always
understanding even when that which is understood is also deeply painful, because
love is painful. You cannot control it, or dress love in fine clothing. You either
see love for what it is -- or you want something else that you just like to call love,
because all ego-based neurosis indulges flattering the self.
Popularity and fame are only just another facet of this projected mental disorder. Fans do not "love"
anything. They only seek self-absolution by identifying with someone they think
is larger than themselves. If given a chance, they will tear off the flesh of stardom
and hang it on necklaces so they can possess little mystic pieces of eternal bliss.
Once again, vanity has misunderstood devotion.
So when I say, I love you, understand that those 3 simple words can mean many different
things. Love in the absence of understanding is only a lonely delusion, and if I
sacrifice my life for what I believe in, it is not because of love. It is because
that is the nature of my being, and my being is one of consummate love.
|Monday, 23 June 2008 at 8h 44m 10s|
An Honest assessment of the energy future, from a Physics perspective
Click here for
a refreshingly frank assessment of every single one of the energy options by mankind, from Professor David J C MacKay of the
Cambridge University Department of Physics.
This debate should be based upon the merits of science and fact, not colored by the self-serving motivations of Energy
conglomerates OR the dreamy notions of eco-friendly consumerism. How many putative enviro-saavy persons can't change
their own personal consumption-waste-water-usage habits -- like buying their everyday coffee with a paper cup, or taking a
shower every single day?
Our current (American) consumption habits were formed on the backs of a human revolution in relatively cheap, easily accessible,
easily convertible, oil and coal resources. The era will be ending within the next 50 years, and many of the habits we have formed
in the meantime are going to be impossible to maintain.
Read what the professor has to say, and draw your own conclusions. Furthermore, consult these two other resources
- A book by Paul C. Roberts : The End Of Oil
- The book by Professor David J C MacKay : Without Hot Air.
Don't let the mindless media pundits warp your brain with nonsense and hyperbole. You can sit around watching the Discovery
channel and the History channel, but what you really get is cheap speculative productions more often than not. Television is not a
reliable resource, and is only a substitute for intellectually lazy and socially depraved individuals who want compromised savants
telling them how to think and what to think about while spewing egregious dishonesty.
|Sunday, 22 June 2008 at 9h 52m 11s|
The FISA surrender
Click here for a solid
analysis of the FISA bill
surrender compromise that occurred this week by Salon's Glenn Greenwald -- who not
only tears it apart, but also dissects the pathetic news analysts who are inundating the public with justifications for throwing away
the 4th amendment.
Apparently, in an election year, you have to make compromises with authoritarian corporatists.
|Friday, 20 June 2008 at 11h 2m 26s|
McCain is breaking the law ... Obama is not.
Obama is not a hypocrite when he decides to opt out of public financing. Obama has not accepted any corporate funds
Lobbying PAC money, and is raising all of his millions from small online donors. 2 million times 100 dollars each equals 200
million dollars people. The star has not fallen.
But if you listen to the genuflecting press corps, you might think otherwise. Saint McCain is called "authentic". Funny. Did you
know he's is breaking the Federal Public Financing laws?
it was quite a thing to see John McCain denouncing Barack Obama for breaking his word on public financing when McCain himself
is at this moment breaking the law in continuing to spend over the spending limits he promised to abide by through the primary
season in exchange for public financing. (By the FEC's rules, we're still in the primary phase of the election and will be until the
I want to return to this subject though because this is not hyperbole or some throw away line. He's really doing it. McCain opting
into public financing, accepted the spending limits and then profited from that opt-in by securing a campaign saving loan. And
then he used some clever, but not clever enough lawyering, to opt back out. And the person charged with saying what flies and
what doesn't -- the Republican head of the FEC -- said he's not allowed to do that. He can't opt out unilaterally unless the FEC
says he can.
The most generous interpretation of what happened is that McCain's lawyer came up with an ingenious legal two step that
allowed him to double dip in the campaign finance system, eat his cake and spend it too. But even if you buy that line, successful
gaming of the system doesn't really count as strict adherence. And the point is irrelevant since the head of the FEC -- a
Republican -- says McCain cannot do this on his own.
Marshall | TalkingPointsMemo | 20 June 2008]
If you click the SOURCE link, there is a video where Josh Marshall explains the legal details of how McCain is breaking the laws in
about 7 minutes.
Click here for Jane
Hamsher's explanation of all this madness.
Here's the skinny. Basically, you can't spend more than 54 million dollars over the course of the primary election season once
you accept public financing. McCain applied for public financing in the Fall of 2007, and got access to 5 million dollars in public
funds. McCain then used the guaranteed 5 million federal dollars as collateral to obtain a million dollar loan during the primary
season. The Republican head of the FEC (David Mason) says McCain can't opt out unless the FEC says he can opt out, and told
McCain. Then Bush fired David Mason. Also, since new nominees to the FEC are being held up by the Bush administration's
unwillingness to compromise
with Congress (and insistence upon pushing corrupt individuals), the FEC doesn't have a quorum of commissioners to enforce the
law. So John McCain is ignoring the law, and using creative lawyering to justify his position.
That's the Straight Talk Express authenticity, yep.
|Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 9h 23m 19s|
Show trials are more important than the administration of Justice
According to Lt. Cmdr. William C. Kuebler, a military lawyer for a Guantánamo detainee, in a recent interview by the New York
The Bush administration’s war crimes system “is designed to get criminal convictions” with “no real evidence,” Commander
Kuebler says. Or he lets fly that military prosecutors “launder evidence derived from torture.”
“You put the whole package together and it stinks,” he said in an interview.
The lawyers, trained in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, were selected to defend detainees in a judicial system established
especially for terrorism suspects. But many of them share a sense of indignation that Guantánamo makes military justice seem
like watered-down justice. Representing detainees, said one of them, Lt. Cmdr. Brian L. Mizer, “is a historic opportunity to defend
the rule of law.
Commander Kuebler (pronounced KEEB-ler) is the latest example of a lawyer in uniform attacking the Pentagon’s legal system.
He is no natural agitator. At 37, he is in some ways deeply conventional. Married to the first girl he ever dated in high school, he
is a self-described born-again Christian and conservative who has “never voted for a Democrat.” Tom Fleener, a former
Guantánamo military defense lawyer, described Commander Kuebler, saying, “Take the average conservative guy in the street and
multiply that by a million.”
Glaberson | New York Times | 19 June 2008]
Today's SF Comical front page story?
- Cal and Tree-sitters both claim victory
- Tiger Woods knee injury
- African Penguins welcomed to new SF home
Proof again that the SF Comical isn't worthy of being used to wrap fish.
|Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 9h 8m 43s|
It was about oil
Oil companies have been running American foreign policy since the 1930's. No surprise's here.
Four Western oil companies are in the final stages of negotiations this month on contracts that will return them to Iraq, 36 years
after losing their oil concession to nationalization as Saddam Hussein rose to power.
Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP — the original partners in the Iraq Petroleum Company[which Saddam threw out when he
nationalized Iraqi oil] — along with Chevron and a number of smaller oil companies, are in talks with Iraq’s Oil Ministry for no-bid
contracts to service Iraq’s largest fields, according to ministry officials, oil company officials and an American diplomat.
There was suspicion among many in the Arab world and among parts of the American public that the United States had gone to
war in Iraq precisely to secure the oil wealth these contracts seek to extract. The Bush administration has said that the war was
necessary to combat terrorism. It is not clear what role the United States played in awarding the contracts; there are still American
advisers to Iraq’s Oil Ministry.
[SOURCE: Andrew E. Kramer | New York Times | 19 June
And so now we need 58 permanent military bases in Iraq to protect the
investments of the oil companies
|Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 8h 55m 42s|
The truth about drilling for oil in Alaska
The spin offered by a few too many ideologues and ignorant individuals is that drilling in Alaska will alleviate our dependence
upon Middle East oil, but that tree-hugging environmentalists are stopping that from happening.
The Energy Information Administration is the independent statistical and
analytical agency within the Department of Energy. From the Energy Information Administration's own May 2008 report on the
In all three ANWR resource cases, ANWR crude oil production begins in 2018 and grows during most of the projection period
before production begins to decline. In the mean oil resource case, ANWR oil production peaks at 780,000 barrels per day in
2027. The low- resource-case production peaks at 510,000 barrels per day in 2028, while the high- resource-case production
peaks at 1,450,000 barrels per day in 2028. Cumulative oil production resulting from the opening of ANWR from 2018 through
2030 amounts to 2.6 billion barrels in the mean resource case, 1.9 billion barrels in the low resource case, and 4.3 billion barrels
in the high resource case.
[SOURCE: Energy Information Administration | May 2008]
Peaking at 1,450,000 barrels per day in 2028 is the best-case scenario, and the mean-case scenario is only 780,000 barrels a
day by 2027. The total amount of oil that could be extracted (cumulative oil production) is somewhere between 2.6 and 4.3
billion barrels from 2018 to 2030 (2.6 is the average case scenario).
According to Nationmaster.com we use 20,730,000 barrels of oil per day. That is 7,566,450,000 barrels (7.5 billion) for
the entire year -- and this number is increasing !!!
In other words, if we drilled in Alaska, the total amount of oil we could extract over a period of 12 years is somewhere between 3
to 6 months of our yearly consumption. With the daily peak of barrels per day somewhere between 2% to 5% of our current daily
How is this difficult to extract oil going to free us from dependence on Middle East Oil?
Answer: it isn't.
But that won't stop spineless liars like Glenn Beck from saying otherwise, and then using his false statements to beat up on
liberal tree-hugging politicians.
|Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 8h 18m 58s|
What the mainstream press won't tell you about Cindy McCain
All this coverage over Michelle Obama -- including front page treatment in the San Francisco Comical -- but very little about
McCain's (2nd) wife -- remember he divorced the first one after she was badly mangled in a car accident.
Perhaps that's because Cindy McCain has some legit skeleton's in her own closet.
In 1989, following two back surgeries, Cindy McCain became addicted to the painkillers Vicodin and Percocet. To keep up with her
daily need of 10 to 15 pills, she used other people's names for prescriptions and stole drugs from the American Voluntary Medical
Team, a mobile surgical unit she'd begun in 1988 to provide emergency medical services around the world. A 1993 DEA audit of the
amount of painkillers her charity had obtained quickly uncovered her thefts. She avoided prosecution for those crimes through an
agreement with the Justice Department in which she submitted to drug testing, paid a fine, performed community service in a soup
kitchen, and joined Narcotics Anonymous. She also closed her medical charity
[SOURCE: Snopes.com | | April 2008]
If Snopes says it's true, then it is the truth.
Where is the race-baiting press on this issue?
|Wednesday, 18 June 2008 at 8h 45m 11s|
You are born that way
Funny that the San Francisco Comical which is busy putting the married gay people issue on every single front page this
week -- at the expense of more relevant breaking news, I mean what's wrong with page 3 or 4.
Yet this story is nowhere
in the San Francisco Chronicle:
Scientists investigating human sexuality have found that the brains of homosexuals have structural and functional differences
from those of “straight” people.
Lesbians appear to have a lower proportion of grey matter in their brains than straight women, giving their brains a more “male-
The brains of gay men appear to have structural similarities to those of heterosexual women. They also exhibit the same powerful
response as straight women to the sex hormones released in male sweat.
Scientists have long thought this meant there should be differences in the brains of homosexuals. Brain scanning equipment has
only recently become powerful enough to seek them out, however.
[SOURCE: Jonathan Leake | London Times | 15
Hmm, so writing endlessly about Gay marriages is okay, but writing about scientific research that indicates how homosexuals are
different from birth is not relevant. Notice that the Times article is from Sunday. So in 4 days, the Comical can't publish an
account of the Science behind homosexuality, but pumps out front page pictures and articles of gay people hugging and getting
Sounds like the editors just want to beat a controversial issue that gets people riled up rather than do an actual relevant news
GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS