frankilin roosevelt

It's not about being liberal or conservative anymore y'all. That is a hype offered by the fascist whores who want to confuse the people with lies while they turn this country into an aristocratic police state. Some people will say anything to attain power and money. There is no such thing as the Liberal Media, but the Corporate media is very real.



Check out my old  Voice of the People page.


Gino Napoli
San Francisco, California
High School Math Teacher

jonsdarc@mindspring.com




Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.

a middle-aged
George Washington



ARCHIVES
1176 POSTS
LATEST ITEM

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
September 2014
August 2014
May 2014
March 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
August 2009
July 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

Thursday, 24 January 2008 at 17h 40m 28s

A toll road through a State Park in Southern California

A toll road will cross through the upper right of the picture and meet the Interstate in the bottom right, piercing the land with automobile noise and smog residues.



The gubernator came out in support of the private toll road project. Here is how he explained his position, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Backing away from his neutral stance, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday urged the California Coastal Commission to approve a controversial tollway in Orange County that would pass through San Onofre State Beach, one of California's most popular parks.

"I have concluded that this project is essential to protect our environment and the quality of life for everyone in California," Schwarzenegger said in a letter to Patrick Kruer, chairman of the Coastal Commission.

"The project can be built in a manner that will enhance and foster use of the coast and protect coastal resources."

...Schwarzenegger noted that the Foothill South project was a public-private partnership that would rely on private capital, not state and federal funds, for construction.

He also mentioned that the TCA had offered $100 million to reduce the effect of the road on the park and provide improvements to San Onofre, San Clemente State Park and Crystal Cove State Park.

"The State Route 241 project gives us a chance to protect our parks and our coastline and reduce one of the most damaging environmental problems that plagues our state: traffic gridlock," Schwarzenegger said in his endorsement letter.


[SOURCE: David Reyes & Dan Weikel | Los Angeles Times | ]

Hmmm, so we protect our parks and coastline by tossing a sacrificial lamb to the slaughter. How do you reduce environmental problems by adding a private toll road through a large state park? Note the tense of that verb in the 5th paragraph. He also mentioned that the TCA HAD offered $100 million . This is not a guarantee, nor is the $100 million offered part of a contractual obligion. What is this man talking about? What a lot of crap this governor is.

Here's what Robin Everett of the the California Coastal Commission thinks.

Last week, Governor Schwarzenegger voiced his approval of plans to destroy a state park for a toll road stating that “this project is essential to protect our environment and the quality of life for everyone in Southern California.” Since when does destroying a state park improve our environment and quality of life?

[SOURCE: Robin Everett | California Coastal Commission | ]

The California State Parks commission hates the idea too. So do a majority of Orange County voters according to a poll (see the link).

“The survey indicated that while a majority of Orange County voters support toll roads in general (53%), a large majority (70%) oppose a toll road through a state park and more than half of all surveyed (52%) strongly oppose toll roads through a state park.


Wednesday, 23 January 2008 at 22h 34m 47s

935 false statements

The Center for public integrity has just completed a data base of all the false statements the administration made regarding Iraq or foreign policy between 2001 and 2007. Apparently there are 935 false statements total. Go to the site and have fun !!!!

Here's the instructions:

The 380,000-plus-word database presented here allows, for the first time, the Iraq-related public pronouncements of top Bush administration officials to be tracked on a day-by-day basis against their private assessments and the actual “ground truth” as it is now known.

Throughout the database, passages containing false statements by the top Bush administration officials are highlighted in yellow. The 935 false statements in the database may also be accessed by selecting the “False Statements” option from the “Subject” pull-down menu and may be displayed within selected date ranges using the selection tool below.

Searches may also be limited by person or subject, or both, by using the appropriate selections from the pull-down menus.



Wednesday, 23 January 2008 at 18h 3m 51s

Court say A-Okay to steal

Yesterday, the supreme court ruled 5-4 that Officers employed by the Federal Government are immune from being sued when property belonging to someone else gets lost or stolen. Here is the first sentence of the New York Times job on the story.

Federal law enforcement officers are immune from lawsuits for mishandling, losing or even stealing personal property that comes under their control in the course of their official duties,

[SOURCE: Linda Greenhouse | New York Times | 23 January 2008]

Justice Kennedy wrote a dissent for the minority, while Ruth Ginsberg turned out to be the swing vote. The New York Times doesn't give you the Dissent. You have to go to the Washington Post for that relevant information.


The confusion in the courts comes because the immunity is mentioned in a section of the law that blocks lawsuits against the government over the "loss of goods, merchandise or other property" detained by customs or excise officers. The law then adds "or any other law enforcement officer."

... Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the dissent for the rest of the court. He said the court was wrong not to look at the context of the statute -- that it related to customs rather than prisons -- and said the implications of the decision were great.

"The seizure of property by an officer raises serious concerns for the liberty of our people and the Act should not be read to permit appropriation of property without a remedy in tort by language so obscure and indirect," Kennedy wrote.


[SOURCE: Robert Barnes | Washington Post | 23 January 2008]

And that's the point. The context of the law is always important. When customs agents seize goods from merchants and/or illegal operations, can they be sued when the stuff they seize disappears or gets stolen? This is a quite different scenario than a prisoner transferring from a Georgia Penitentiary to a Kentucky Prison who has his stuff stolen in the transit. The stuff was not part of a group of illegal items that were seized, the stuff was personal property. Justice Kennedy has makes a very good point.

Here's a link to the supreme court docket where the Ali case PDF of the court opinions exists.

We now have a court which liberally interprets laws out of context to serve the masters who put them on the court.

~ ~ ~

A Note on the difference in the 2 articles. The Washington Post article is much more informative. The New York Times piece (probably given to a rookie reporter, and probably ruthlessly edited) gives you the impression that the decision was just a minor update of interpretation of an ambiguity. The Times article doesn't give the reader the necessary background information of the court case, or the various issues involving the interpretations of the law .

Lesson #23,567 : Never rely on only one source of information.


Tuesday, 22 January 2008 at 20h 51m 47s

21.9% of US children in poverty


[SOURCE:  | Economic Policy Institute | 19 July 2006]

The dark horizontal bars represent after welfare, food stamps, and tax deductions are included. The light bars represent before these various government transfer payments (subsidies from tax revenue) are included.

26.6% of our children live in poverty before government programs are included; 21.9% are still in poverty after such payments are included. Oh my god. That's somewhere between 20% to 25% of the kids. And as a measure of relativity, notice the bar on the bottom. That is the average percent of all the countries except the U.S. Our percentage of child poverty after government assistence is greater than the average of all the other countries combined.

It's pathetic is what it is. We can blow 2 trillion dollars on national disaster in Iraq, but we can't just make a life-long financial investment in every citizen's education from pre_K to Post- Bac. Instead, we prefer to deal with the social consequences as the costs of frustrated young people who manage to scrap by working a service-related job. Some might manage a few years at a community college, only to still find themselves in the service sector 10 years later. It would be a better allocation of resources to fund opportunity for our young people. Some of the investment will get wasted, but then nothing is ever 100%. But unlike the Iraq debacle, all of the money would be invested in the USA, rather than line the pockets of the Defense contractors. And then what? Did the invasion beget a "more stable" middle east? Did it "secure" a stable oil supply?

Ha. We have to pay the Sunni Sheiks each $100 a day to not raise up the fight against the US troops. Do a google yourself, if you don't believe me. That's how despicable this whole thing is to me. The wasted lives and the wasted funds are disgraceful.


Tuesday, 22 January 2008 at 17h 57m 9s

My oil painting


The above is the oil painting I've been working on for 4 years now. Or rather, the place where I stopped and put the painting down is 4 years ago.

I don't know why I just stopped, or why it has been four years, but it has something to do with a certain struggle with the universe that I've been having over the last 4 years. I get disappointed very easily by the actions of others (and myself -- it works both ways) when I feel things don't happen the way I'd like. People will disappoint you in life, and you still have to wake up and be that great pleasant guy everyone loves. So what I did was hibernate. I closed off the world and escaped, or tried to, but since there is no escape, all I really did was vegetate into oblivion. Yet nothing ever really numbs the disappointment, and instead you just dig a deep lonely hole that you don't think you'll ever get out of.

Well, about 3 months ago, I finally got the courage to stop digging. I am currently getting the layers of dirt out of my eyes, and I'm finally starting to deal with a lot of things that I just plain buried. I tried to stop the feelings, but of course, they never go away. Now, I accept the pain, and try to better understand the origins and the most beneficial reactions. I also realized that everyone else is fucked up too, and started channeling my innate curiousity into pondering everyone's unique contribution to fucked-upp-ed-ness.

As you can see, the painting is only 2 to 3 hours away from being complete. All I really need to do is finish the sky, and I couldn't finish the sky in the last four years, because there was no blue sky in my life. My best friend killed himself 3 years ago. My home town was destroyed 2 years ago, and I was going through something close to a mid-life crisis while avoiding a host of related issues. My way to handle these various issues was also unhealthy. I couldn't feel the blue when my horizons were colored with grey.

I just bought a whole new bunch of paint, new paint-brushes, and new jugs of Linseed oil and Mineral spirits. Hope has sprung from the once frozen earth.


Monday, 21 January 2008 at 10h 46m 31s

Why California has a $10 billion budget hole

The short story: it is Governor Schwartzeneger's own damn fault.

There are several areas where the Governor, with his current goals and agenda--on the budget, health care, and other issues--is hamstrung by his previous policy stances.

• Many have made the point that today's budget crisis yielding $10 billion in budget cuts is a direct result of his early actions. He reduced the vehicle license fee, which in the current budget year creates a $6.1 billion hole (booked as state spending because of the county backfill). There's another $3 billion that we are paying to service the debt he create with his bond package--a decision he made rather than to either raise revenues or make additional cuts. So that's over $9 billion right there. If he had made different decisions, he wouldn't be in the whole he is in today.


[SOURCE: Anthony Wright | California Progress Report | 21 January 2008]


Sunday, 20 January 2008 at 9h 18m 23s

Just another day of death and mayhem in Iraq

FACTBOX-Security developments in Iraq, Jan 20
20 Jan 2008 14:22:55 GMT
[SOURCE:  | Reuters | 20 January 2008]

Jan 20 (Reuters) - The following are security developments in Iraq at 1400 GMT on Sunday.

  • BAGHDAD - A roadside bomb targeting a police patrol killed a civilian and wounded two policemen in Zayouna district in eastern Baghdad, police said.

  • NEAR NAJAF - Iraqi security forces have arrested 45 gunmen from the Shi'ite "Soldiers of Heaven" cult in the last three days in the provinces of Basra, Nassiriya and Najaf, a Najaf provincial spokesman said.

  • BAGHDAD - The U.S. military said the final death toll in multiple truck bombings targeting Iraq's minority Yazidi sect in northern Iraq last August was 796.

  • FALLUJA - A suicide bomber killed six people in a town south of Falluja where people were celebrating the release of a man from U.S. military custody, local officials said. The bomber walked into the man's house and blew himself up.

  • MOSUL - Police said they shot dead the driver of a car rigged with explosives during an attempted attack on a police checkpoint in eastern Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad. The car detonated, wounding two people.

  • BAGHDAD - Iraqi soldiers killed eight gunmen and arrested 54 others during the last 24 hours across Iraq, the Defence Ministry said.

  • BALAD - Five people were killed and 20 were wounded when mortar bombs hit Shi'ites observing Ashura rituals in Balad, 80 km (50 miles) north of Baghdad, on Saturday, police said.

  • BAGHDAD - U.S. forces detained 16 gunmen on Friday and Saturday during operations targeting al Qaeda in central and northern Iraq, the U.S. military said.

  • DIYALA PROVINCE - The U.S. military detained 10 gunmen during a raid in northern Diyala province on Thursday, the U.S. military said.

    Writing by Aws Qusay, editing by Ross Colvin


The surge is working, damn it. Can you believe these ungrateful Iraqis attacking their "liberators" ? Had they risen up against mean old Saddam back in 2003, we wouldn't have had to invade Iraq and post troops all over their country for the next 20 years. Keep in mind that after the end of World War Two when American troops were stationed in Germany and Japan, NOT ONE AMERICAN SOLDIER WAS KILLED IN ACTION.

If the Iraqi's want us to leave, why are we still in the country performing security operations? The nation is no more stable or any less corrupted by our insistence on remaining.


Sunday, 20 January 2008 at 2h 7m 46s

The bloviating press corps

...Andrea Mitchell is still at it. She calls the Nevada outcome, based on their exit polls showing African Americans going for Barack in a big way while women and "Latinos" going for Hillary, as a "historic divide" within the party, and "not something that any Democrat would want to see." That's right - it's nothing but doom and gloom from Mrs. Alan Greenspan at the sight that women and Hispanics go for Hillary while African Americans go for Obama.

Can I just say how much I deeply detest the frauds on TV, the ones like Andrea Mitchell - among many others?

First of all, if Sen. Obama☼ is the great uniter that he claims to be, isn't it more than reasonable to think that he would unite behind the eventual Democratic nominee (if Sen. Clinton☼ wins the nomination) and get his supporters to do the same? Does anyone seriously believe that a charismatic Democrat who says he can unite Republicans and Independents with Democrats cannot unite Democrats with other Democrats?

Secondly, what is more important here is the fact that the "stars" in the media - those who get paid undeservedly princely sums to pontificate ignorantly and spread lies and division - routinely keep people uninformed. I wrote earlier that despite the Rev. Jesse Jackson having gotten historic primary wins in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential campaigns - a generation earlier - many in the media have repeatedly ignored that to create the false impression that Sen. Obama's campaign was uniquely historic.


[SOURCE:  | theleftcoaster.com | 19 January 2008]

Over the last week, the Chronicle has pushed the race theme by offering Carla Marinucci and sidekick piece of shit "political analyst" Joe Garofoli to pathetically assert that Hillary and Obama lost all the progress they made over the weekend because they handled "race" inadequately during the debate.

The front-runners for the Democratic presidential nomination realized something in the past week: Talking clumsily about race in America is the quickest way to turn off new voters and silence the buzz generated in the early weeks of the campaign.

[SOURCE: Carla Marinucci & Joe Garofoli | San Francisco Comical | 17 January 2008]

That was the opening paragraph to the politicalese that passes for journalism these days. And this story was on the front god damn page. There was nothing substantive in the entire article, and plenty of speculation. If you read the entire article, the piece moves to conjecture about what young voters will do to a statement of campaign personality, before highlighting one selected voter experiencing the sub-prime mortgage pain (a daughter's mother died and missed only one payment, the month she died), followed by mentioning a Bill Clinton speech which discusses a policy position on how to address the mortgage crisis, followed of course with the typical Republican excuse to do nothing while destroying the government of the people ....


Clinton told the crowd his wife "believes we should freeze all forecloses for 90 days" and work with lenders on policies that would protect homeowners who are faithfully making payments.

In the meantime, "the most expensive thing we can do is to throw all of you out of your homes," he said. "If we allow this to take its course, it will cost us far more." He said that, according to estimates, "the net cost to society is a quarter million dollars every time you foreclose on a house."

That, he said, is "the dumbest thing we can do."

Republicans are dubious that Sen. Clinton's proposals to solve the mortgage crisis would work.

"The changes Sen. Clinton proposes to deliver would result in massive tax hikes, government-run health care and weakened national defense," said Republican National Committee spokesman Paul Lindsay. "As long as she and her surrogates attempt to mislead voters on these critical issues, Clinton will continue to lack the trust that Americans expect in their commander in chief."


Surrogates. Misleading voters. Lacking the trust of America. All topics the Republicans know very well. Plus the usual boogeyman of "massive tax hikes". Because you see, not only do Republicans make excuses to permit massive corruption and moral depravity, they also refuse to pay for it.


Sunday, 20 January 2008 at 1h 7m 49s

Martin Luther King and Lyndon Johnson

This is first hand history, from Bill Moyers.

Bill Moyers, who was Lyndon Johnson’s press secretary from 1965-1967, gives his perspective on the “tempest in a teapot” of the Hillary vs. Obama media brawl over LBJ and MLK:

As the pressure intensified on each side, Johnson wanted King to wait a little longer and give him a chance to bring Congress around by hook or crook. But Martin Luther King said his people had already waited too long. He talked about the murders and lynchings, the churches set on fire, children brutalized, the law defied, men and women humiliated, their lives exhausted, their hearts broken. LBJ listened, as intently as I ever saw him listen. He listened, and then he put his hand on Martin Luther King’s shoulder, and said, in effect: “OK. You go out there Dr. King and keep doing what you’re doing, and make it possible for me to do the right thing.” Lyndon Johnson was no racist but he had not been a civil rights hero, either. Now, as president, he came down on the side of civil disobedience, believing it might quicken America’s conscience until the cry for justice became irresistible, enabling him to turn Congress. So King marched and Johnson maneuvered and Congress folded.


[SOURCE: Nicole Belle | CrooksandLiars.com | 19 January 2008]
[ORIGINAL SOURCE: Bill Moyers Journal | 18 January 2008]


Saturday, 19 January 2008 at 9h 34m 7s

How bad is the economic situation?

The US stock market is off to one of its worst starts in history, credit is shrinking, and home prices are declining at rates never seen before. The current credit and housing crises have been on the front pages of even non business newspapers since last summer. It’s a mess out there. At the same time, our nation’s leaders in Washington are still assuring Americans that they are monitoring the situation closely and will be ready to act in order to avoid any negative consequences of the current credit crisis. What are they waiting for?

Several months into this episode, the lack of decisive action is unnerving and apparent to even the most casual investor. This is a real crisis of confidence. No matter what your opinion of the proper steps, if any, that are needed, there is no denying the fact that financial markets hate uncertainty. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what they are getting.


[SOURCE:  | Bespoke Investments | 19 January 2008]




GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS