Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.
|Friday, 20 December 2013 at 3h 19m 19s|
Recently, their has been a lot of hacks into corporate business servers stealing credit cards and
financial information. It has happened to me three times in the last 10 years, and the same can be
said for probably most people. The bank cancelled the card and I had to wait 7 days for a re-issue,
but the reality is that the information is still in the hands of some criminal or criminal
enterprise that might decide to take out a loan with my name and do all sorts of other nasty things
-- that really happen.
Target's CEO came out an issued a statement
Target’s first priority is preserving the trust of our guests and we have moved swiftly to address
this issue, so guests can shop with confidence. We regret any inconvenience this may cause.
[SOURCE: Huffington Post | | 19 December
This thing called monopoly consolidation and agency theory of corporations gets in the way of the
corporations ability to do anything else BUT a ritualized public relations campaign. Problems are
supposed to go away and fix themselves once Target spends 10 million or so on a massive advert
campaign with happy caring employees and soothing music and nice people that have nice voices saying
how much Target does to protect your private information.
For those of you who don't know, "Agency theory" means that managers who do not own the company are
making decisions about the welfare and operations instead of the owners. Allowing the "agents"
(CEO's) to have some of the profits is supposed to keep them interested in the welfare of the
corporation. This theory might have some merit in a competitive business environment. However, once
the competitiveness of a given sector of the economy becomes limited and oligarchical, a different
system evolves, and the need for competent management becomes less important than loyalty
So despite the stream of advertisements, nothing will change. The CEO is no longer human. He is a
sociopathic robot. How else can
you expect them to say such obvious hypocrisy with a straight face. They are paid huge dollars to
soothe their conflicted souls, and they are surrounded by self-inflated egos and sycophants to the
point where they are beyond clueless. The few that are different, who survive the pressures and
remain sane are rare specimens to be cherished.
Target is not afraid of losing customers, and they depend upon the average zombie who buys their
cheap crap to have a memory shorter than a house fly. Just like all the commercials paid for by BP
depicting a return to normal on the shores of the Gulf of Mexico by an astute looking attentive
corporate manager from BP. All the spills every month all over the country from burst and leaking
pipelines, or run-off from coal extraction and "fracking" that destroy's drinking water and poisons
the topsoil for decades. All the cancer's created by exposure to toxic chemicals. All the deaths
due to negligence and lack of concern for safety oversight. All of it is washed away by the magic
of cinematography and a good video editor at a top-notch Hollywood studio.
Everything is fine people. Go back to sleep and pretend the invisible hand runs the magical free
market independent of and without any human influence whatsoever.
|Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 5h 10m 15s|
The achievement gap
If you look at those graphs, you notice a rise in black and spanish from 1973 to 1990, followed by
flatline, whereas the blue line is fairly flat.
It's because you can't teach critical thinking. All you can do is create an environment that
enables every student to reach their potential. To a large extent the mind is only so good as the
development. If a human never learns syntax or language by the age of 7 or 8, that human will never
be able to learn a language because their mind has developed too far beyond the necessary time that
language could be accommodated. It's neurological reality. A student who has not had the same
opportunities of development at the age of 14 is at an inherent disadvantage, which is why such
development must begin and be addressed as early as possible.
Overtime the level of knowledge and average human ability increases, but the process isn't constant
or consistent. In 1950, 25% of US High school students took Algebra in high school and maybe 40%
graduated. In 1900, Calculus was a subject only a few college students ever took. Today, every
single high school teaches a Calculus class, and most have more than one section per year. Today,
almost every student take Algebra in high school, and the national high school graduation rate is
Beware of wolves who speak of crisis and offer reforms for a problem that doesn't exist.
Our schools are fine for the most part, the schools that are in trouble are in trouble for reasons
outside of the schools themselves. They've been saying there's been an education crisis since the
1950's and yet there has been no shortage of ingenuity and innovation in the economy. There are
plenty of high quality engineers and professionals who are top notch graduating every year, and year
after year despite so called crisis of education that doesn't teach "critical thinking" or whatever
is the buggaboo currently available.
The corporate elite keep saying they can't hire people who have skills. But then you find out about
how they offer $10 per hour jobs for high level skills that used to be top dollar, so that people
who have such skills are more likely to get their employment elsewhere rather than take a large cut
in pay. Then you find out that the same companies keep turning away quality high skilled applicants
... because they are "too old" or don't "fit the profile" because they have "too much experience".
In other words the real problems isn't a skills gap at all. The real problem is these corporations
don't want to pay living wages and would rather inexperienced wage-slaves trained dirt-cheap on the
public dime then they care about education.
Funny that the danger of falling behind the rest of the world didn't stop the entrepeneurs who build
the computer industry and the internet and the many new businesses that evolved since 1980. Because
we really do have one of the best educational systems in the world. The problems have to do with
economic disparity not a poor educational model.
I would also add that it's not that we teach black and spanish kids poorly and white kids better so
much as it is that black and spanish kids are more likely to come from a poor educational or family
background. If the average spanish/black kid was equivalent to the average white kid, the gap would
be much much less than it is now.
And remember that the graphs are based on averages. Just because the lines for black and spanish
kids is lower, does NOT mean ALL black and spanish kids are lower.
The problem with the disparity also has more to do with the larger problems of economic inequality
than it does with the system of education. Schools cannot address the larger social problems alone,
and this factor shows up in the achievement gap. A Stanford professor found that 2/3rds of the
variation in the PISA test scores (from 2006) can be explained by how many books they have in the home.
This would be 0.81 correlation coefficient ... or 81% -- which is btw the same correlation as
between IQ and scholastic achievement.
There is also the reality that these NAEP tests (and the PISA tests) are very challenging. Most
would have a hard time if they took them. The tests are more like tests you give to see if a student
is gifted and talented. They are not proficiency assessments. They are not testing to see how much
you know, but how you think and the depth of your thinking. So you can't see these poor results as
reflecting a lack of education or knowledge.
|Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 20h 6m 11s|
So what am I thinking about today, oh many things really. There's no way I could succinctly
summarize all of the random thoughts into a few morsels.
But in the past 15 minutes, I've been thinking about the women I've known in my life, thinking about
the relationship from their point of view, which is something I like to do in general. What is the
perspective from someone else's point of view. That stranger on the bus or in the grocery store,
what is their life about, what are their thoughts, their issues. The imagination wanders.
I've had 5 girlfriends in my life that I really liked. Two other hook ups were nice girls but we
never got a chance to develop a relation beyond the moment. Only one of those seven girls do I
really still love, even though I accept the reality that I will never see her again.
She's happily married living somewhere in the world. Sometimes I wonder if she ever reads this
blog, but I suspect that she is completely ignorant of it's existence. She probably never thinks
about me except maybe once or twice a year (maybe) if she thinks about her college years. She was a
girl. She was also completely different than me, and that's probably why it worked for a few years,
but sooner or later those differences began to matter, and well, it just wasn't meant to be.
And it's for the best too. But I still always wonder if I'll ever get an email or contact out of
the blue like has happened with some other people I used to know. I suspect not, but still sometimes
|Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 0h 40m 40s|
The Day the Machines Stopped
I write stuff. Below is something I've been working on. I'm not sure what to do with it, but at
any rate, here it is. I call it, "The Day the Machines Stopped."
The real transformation began when humans made electronic devices that could be held in the palm of
their hands. The machines of locomotion and production that came before, the automobiles, the
bicycles, the conveyor belts, elevators and Bessemer furnaces, these were the neanderthals of the
technological epoch that was to come. First calculators came to do the adding and multiplying that
humans used to do with their own minds, or paper and pencil. Then computers were built and data got
analyzed with electronic ones and zeroes. Visual displays and incredibly rich interaction with the
user enabled access to an almost endless collection of information and video-graphy because of what
was called the internet. But these were just the infants in the stream of wow that evolved from the
process that Michael Faraday discovered in his laboratories hooking up copper wires and magnets
while using chemical solutions for the source of electric currents. Radios, Transistors and
light-emitting diodes, the television and video projection, were then combined to produce the video
game console. Soon the i-pod and their next of kin, the cell phone, added yet more interconnections
with the technological infrastructure. Once the internet, email, text messaging, and broadband
streaming bounced on the scene of everyday living, the human race had entered a new phase of it's
But the biology and bone structures of humans couldn't change so it was the mental aspects of human
culture which evolved instead. People forgot various aspects of their humanity as they replaced
their daily lives with technological devices not much larger than the palms of their hands.
Interaction with life shrunk down to a 6 inch by 10 inch rectangular surface of images and sounds
transmitted to the dark sunglass lens that people began to put on their eyes No one acknowledged
the presence of anyone else unless they sent an electronic signal to their cellular device, or the
person's removed the sunglasses and decided to unplug from such devices. Automobiles became driven
by computers and high-tech radar/sonar sensory equipment. Humans often slept on their way to work,
or play video games while the cars drove them home or to the supermarket big box chain stores that
sold everything now. People visited one another and had their conversations mostly by video
conferencing or by sending text messages in chat rooms. There was the rare occasion when two
strangers would interact beyond a few polite words of "excuse me" or "are you waiting in line", but
even in social or community situations most people remained plugged in to the tech devices that sent
them constant images to the sunglasses and sounds to the small ear plugs. More usually, when people
were talking out loud, they were talking to no one in the immediate vicinity, but rather to someone
on the other end of the connection to the ether of telecommunications.
The devices began to do all of the thinking after a few generations. Instantly need a fact or need
to research some historical matter, it would never take longer than a minute to get the information
you wanted, along with highly detailed visual maps and lots of short video clips. The devices could
tell you how much money you had in your wallet or your bank account. They would also show you in
the margins of the sunglasses the price of the items you are buying, along with how much you have
left after the purchase. They were also designed to completely absorb the personality of their
owners, and were coded specifically to be able to listen to verbalized problems, and respond with
consoling language. They could surprisingly give decent advice about very intricate matters and
complex situations, and although the advice was often not followed, the devices were never
judgmental or sanctimonious. The devices would suggest what you should eat for dinner, what new
restaurant to go to, which route was quicker to the park, who might be an interesting date for
Friday evening, or whether it might be time to go shopping for some new slacks or different looking
blouses. They would organize the entire day's events and then remind you throughout the day so you
wouldn't forget. The devices would even tell you the name of the people you encounter with a secret
whisper in the ear bud, saving you the age-old embarrassment of forgetting someone's name that had
plagued centuries of old-fashion human folk before the new inventions came on the scene in the
latter 21st century.
After two generations, people became incredibly forgetful. Some of them never took off their
sun-glass tech devices, and a new surgery had appeared that was implanting surface screens over the
eye sockets of adults for as little as what was the equivalent of a month's salary for the average
legal secretary. Women had long ago already started putting silicon in their breasts or puffing up
their lips and "lifting" their cheek skin. Men began to have silicon putty additions to their penal
organs not long afterwards. So the eye socket surfaces was only a logical conclusion. The
normative bonding with technology begins to create new associative experiences that could never have
been conceived possible, because the illusion is that there can be a controlled and separated
experience. Once the relationship between man and machine is formed, the process of merging
continues unabated, inexorably moving towards the final conclusion, when our devotion to the
machines destroys the basis of the humanity that created them.
The machines will stop. Eventually we will not be able to produce enough energy to power the grids
that give us the electricity. The metals we use to power the devices will become exhausted. The
fuels that are now used will no longer exist, and solar energy will be how everything is powered,
but the limitations in metal and resource extraction will render impotent the dispersion of solar
technology. There will be too many people, and too few resources. Humans will be lucky if they can
still feed themselves.
However belief systems die hard, and a lot of people looked at the universe or considered the
historical timeline like it was an elaborate fairy tale or something written down and located in the
archaic pages of ancient books. Truth and reality have always been contested arguments, but the
"Here and Now, You Only Live Once" HAN YOLO crowd was not going to become a rallying cry for change
and evolution while being tantalized with the "Future is Now" slogan. Which is a stupid saying
really. Of course the future is now. The future has always been synonymous with the now, because
it's the only thing humans can ever truly know. Except that now, the now is becoming replaced by
machines, which means that we now no longer know what we used to know, and the now has become just
another amorphous entity displaced into the background by some eulogized electronic consciousness.
And alas, humans forget everything by the 5th generation of the mental implants that became standard
issue, in the 2nd century of the second millennium. Adverts for special assistance for the disabled
gradually evolved over 50 years into benefits for students taking difficult courses. One such
commercial involved a student who didn't understand what the college professor was saying, such that
the operating system of the mental implant interpreted and decode the words emanating from the mouth
of the instructor and then spoke this content into the mind of the student. The student then went
on to get an A in the course and all was good. Only two hundred thousand dollars, but the deal also
involved free lifetime upgrades, so apparently the large upfront cost was worth it, considering that
the presumed jobs that resulted would be involve salaries in the millions of dollars.
Meanwhile the planet became more degraded and toxic by the decade. The smog appeared everywhere and
required humans to have to wear masks over their mouths and nose, or their lungs would sear and they
would die within 10 years. Body suits and eye goggles came 50 years later, because apparently the
atmosphere had become so noxious and irritating to the skin that cancers would occur rapidly and the
surfaces of the eye would constantly sting. Humans no longer even experienced the idea of another
human being. They walked around the earth encased in protective suits, spoken to by computers that
The "Unplug movement" was inevitable. It should have been expected. Nevertheless, the media
organizations continued the tradition of completely misunderstanding and misrepresenting reality,
and such persons who existed outside of the official voices were considered "radicals" ,
"nihilists", "whiners" or "idealists". The progress of civilization depended completely upon the
utter destruction of the ecosystem that feeds the humans who live on the planet, but the denial that
refused to understand this reality was thicker and deeper that the width of the entire cosmos,
because human psychology also depends upon a mythology of the universe that abstracts the larger
reality into practical circumstantial units of simplicity. We do not think of Cows with every
double cheese hamburger we devour. We don't consider the polluted areas of the world when we drive
400 miles in a car in 8 hours of time. After the moment has passed, we move on towards new
illusions. Maybe we remember the past, maybe we update different versions of the past, but
regardless of what we do, the past is gone. All we know is right now, right here and now, and if
the past looks different through these modern day eyes, so what? We can always change the story and
make excuses as we go down the road. No big deal. Right?
Except one day. One day after the gradual degradation of all that we thought was normal. The
inability to drink or even touch surface water because of the poisons that would leech up through
the soil after centuries of fertilizer and toxic residue from all the contents that lifted into the
air out of exhaust engines. The gradual acceptance of masks that filtered out the particulates
which became more prevalent in the atmosphere, and were known to be highly carcinogenic. The need
to filter the blood with machines once a year because of all the toxics that were in the food. The
need for couples to have the male sperm cells "cleaned" because of the increased frequency of
One day. When the rivers have dried up because the climate is hurricane and flood oriented and the
low temperatures are in the the 90 degree Fahrenheit range for 70% of the year.
One day. When not only will the horses be gone, but so too the machines. No more automobiles or
planes or huge super ships crossing the ocean, or large factories. Gone. Mankind will be reduced
to the naked animal. Moss will grow over the rubble of the buildings that had existed.
One day. One day the Earth will begin to heal from the thoughtlessly reckless and stupid manner in
which mankind has evolved to live in coexistence with the ecosystem of the planet Earth. We
fantasize about replicas of ourselves who colonize other planets and encounter other beings whom we
ourselves have never encountered. But all of the illusion is just well scripted and entertaining
fiction, because, whoopsie, humanity actually turns out to be a freak accident of interstellar
random energy displacement in the universe, and nothing guarantees we will be able to live on this
garden of eden forever. This is the root of all religion, the root of God and Gods, this chance
that humans have to live, breed, and continue the species into perpetuity. The apple that Adam ate
|Sunday, 24 November 2013 at 17h 36m 54s|
What is happening in Ohio
Click here and here for information about how the charter schools are sucking up so many
students in 53 school districts of Michigan that the school districts just had their bonds rated
downward by Moody's and are in danger of having to expire within 5 years.
This is the plan. It is being conducted within every state. They want to destroy the public school
system and have it replaced by private for-profit charter schools. The first phase of this plan was
the Leave No Child
Behind Act of 2001 where the testing of schools was incorporated into a federal rating system
that automatically triggered a response by the schools who didn't meet certain criteria. Schools
and school districts who were considered "failed" or got "program improvement status" enabled a
trigger provision in the law that allowed charter schools to become permitted -- regardless of local
and state laws.
It was a poison pill, or magic bullet, depending on your perspective. It never was about
This is happening now. In every single state. Google it.
|Sunday, 24 November 2013 at 17h 13m 11s|
JFK 1962 quote
[T]he great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived, and dishonest—but
the myth—persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we hold fast to the cliches of our
forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of
opinion without the discomfort of thought.
Mythology distracts us everywhere—in government as in business, in politics as in economics, in
foreign affairs as in domestic affairs. But today I want to particularly consider the myth and
reality in our national economy. In recent months many have come to feel, as I do, that the dialog
between the parties—between business and government, between the government and the public—is
clogged by illusion and platitude and fails to reflect the true realities of contemporary American
-- John F. Kennedy 
hat tip to Digby.
The above is just a small piece of a larger and longer speech, read the entire speech here.
Here's the first take down of the economic mythology pushed by the oligarchs of Kennedy's day.
Please note the sophistication of the slap down.
Let us take first the question of the size and shape of government. The myth here is that government
is big, and bad—and steadily getting bigger and worse. Obviously this myth has some excuse for
existence. It is true that in recent history each new administration has spent much more money than
its predecessor. Thus President Roosevelt outspent President Hoover, and with allowances for the
special case of the Second World War, President Truman outspent President Roosevelt. Just to prove
that this was not a partisan matter, President Eisenhower then outspent President Truman by the
handsome figure of $182 billion. It is even possible, some think, that this trend may continue.
But does it follow from this that big government is growing relatively bigger? It does not—for the
fact is for the last 15 years, the Federal Government—and also the Federal debt—and also the Federal
bureaucracy—have grown less rapidly than the economy as a whole. If we leave defense and space
expenditures aside, the Federal Government since the Second World War has expanded less than any
other major sector of our national life—less than industry, less than commerce, less than
agriculture, less than higher education, and very much less than the noise about big government.
The truth about big government is the truth about any other great activity—it is complex. Certainly
it is true that size brings dangers—but it is also true that size can bring benefits. Here at Yale
which has contributed so much to our national progress in science and medicine, it may be proper for
me to mention one great and little noticed expansion of government which has brought strength to our
whole society—the new role of our Federal Government as the major patron of research in science and
in medicine. Few people realize that in 1961, in support of all university research in science and
medicine, three dollars out of every four came from the Federal Government. I need hardly point out
that this has taken place without undue enlargement of Government control—that American scientists
remain second to none in their independence and in their individualism.
I am not suggesting that Federal expenditures cannot bring some measure of control. The whole thrust
of Federal expenditures in agriculture have been related by purpose and design to control, as a
means of dealing with the problems created by our farmers and our growing productivity. Each sector,
my point is, of activity must be approached on its own merits and in terms of specific national
needs. Generalities in regard to federal expenditures, therefore, can be misleading—each case,
science, urban renewal, education, agriculture, natural resources, each case must be determined on
its merits if we are to profit from our unrivaled ability to combine the strength of public and
And the smack about debt and deficits was present back in 1962 just as it is still to this very day
Still in the area of fiscal policy, let me say a word about deficits. The myth persists that Federal
deficits create inflation and budget surpluses prevent it. Yet sizeable budget surpluses after the
war did not prevent inflation, and persistent deficits for the last several years have not upset our
basic price stability. Obviously deficits are sometimes dangerous—and so are surpluses. But honest
assessment plainly requires a more sophisticated view than the old and automatic cliche that
deficits automatically bring inflation.
There are myths also about our public debt. It is widely supposed that this debt is growing at a
dangerously rapid rate. In fact, both the debt per person and the debt as a proportion of our gross
national product have declined sharply since the Second World War. In absolute terms the national
debt since the end of World War II has increased only 8 percent, while private debt was increasing
305 percent, and the debts of State and local governments—on whom people frequently suggest we
should place additional burdens—the debts of State and local governments have increased 378 percent.
Moreover, debts, public and private, are neither good nor bad, in and of themselves. Borrowing can
lead to over-extension and collapse—but it can also lead to expansion and strength. There is no
single, simple slogan in this field that we can trust.
And next, we have Kennedy addressing the Confidence fairy, which has been in the playbook of the
oligarchs since the Civil War.
Finally, I come to the problem of confidence. Confidence is a matter of myth and also a matter of
truth—and this time let me take the truth of the matter first.
It is true—and of high importance—that the prosperity of this country depends on the assurance that
all major elements within it will live up to their responsibilities. If business were to neglect its
obligations to the public, if labor were blind to all public responsibility, above all, if
government were to abandon its obvious—and statutory—duty of watchful concern for our economic
health-if any of these things should happen, then confidence might well be weakened and the danger
of stagnation would increase. This is the true issue of confidence.
But there is also the false issue—and its simplest form is the assertion that any and all
unfavorable turns of the speculative wheel—however temporary and however plainly speculative in
character—are the result of, and I quote, "a lack of confidence in the national administration."
This I must tell you, while comforting, is not wholly true. Worse, it obscures the reality—which is
also simple. The solid ground of mutual confidence is the necessary partnership of government with
all of the sectors of our society in the steady quest for economic progress.
Corporate plans are not based on a political confidence in party leaders but on an economic
confidence in the Nation's ability to invest and produce and consume. Business had full confidence
in the administrations in power in 1929, 1954, 1958, and 1960—but this was not enough to prevent
recession when business lacked full confidence in the economy. What matters is the capacity of the
Nation as a whole to deal with its economic problems and its opportunities.
The stereotypes I have been discussing distract our attention and divide our effort. These
stereotypes do our Nation a disservice, not just because they are exhausted and irrelevant, but
above all because they are misleading—because they stand in the way of the solution of hard and
complicated facts. It is not new that past debates should obscure present realities. But the damage
of such a false dialogue is greater today than ever before simply because today the safety of all
the world—the very future of freedom—depends as never before upon the sensible and clearheaded
management of the domestic affairs of the United States.
The truth is that oligarchy will always say it needs "confidence" in order to "invest" or spend its
massive pile of idle wealth for anything other than itself. Without "confidence" the oligarchs will
spend a lot of money and fund a lot of activities that appear independent, to say a lot of nasty
irrelevant and deceptive things about the government and government officials the oligarchs don't
like unless they bend over backwards doing every single thing the oligarchy pays them to do.
Such officials are then called reasonable, non-partisan, practical or fair-minded, and then suddenly
find themselves with a lot of mainstream press interested in their opinions and day to day affairs.
|Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 17h 14m 38s|
The difference between Democrats and Republicans
The above graphic is the jobs added (blue) or jobs lost (red) per month. Notice that the turn
around in Red happened right after April or May of 2009 -- the first 4 months of the Obama
Competence has it's value. As disappointing to the promise as the Obama administration has been over
the last 6 years, the basic competence of the government has vastly improved. Cronies and
bureaucrats will still exist, but the level of competency will not become compromised because all
Democrats believe in the value and possibility of government, so they have a level of respect for
the integrity of government that is impossible with the Rethuglican's.
Republicans do not like government, and some of them hate government. They utter cute phrases like
"The government is the problem" and when they are in government they appoint corrupt idiots who
serve the purpose of discrediting the government that is supposed to be the problem. They make loud
noises about cutting microscopic budgets that help poor people and/or the middle class, but say
nothing, or wax patriotic about vastly expensive military or privatization schemes that very often
have no merit or purpose other than to pad the profits of some insider/connected firm. Then they
are repaid by the same consortium of business interests with huge yearly consulting fees after
retiring from 16 years service in the government. It's not about free markets, so much as it is
about a free ride to wealth. Save maybe a tiny few who are naive fools, all of the Republicans are
craven political opportunists.
The Democrats on the other hand are more sophisticated in their sophistry. Some call themselves
"practical" which really means they are hesitant to vote against what the big money interests want.
I think they probably constitute 30 or 40% of the party. The other 70 or 60 percent are real
people or genuinely concerned thoughtful citizens. Some of these will get sucked up into the
corruption, because money and power will and does change people, but not all will fall into the
clutches of the vicious oligarchy. A few will even be able to ignore the pressures of media and the
framing of events that is part of the systematic war perpetrated on the American mind by the
oligarchy every single day.
A few. But hey, I'll take 10, 20, or 30 percent over ZERO any day of the week.
|Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 17h 50m 15s|
Social Mobility in the United States per Country or Municipality
The chance a child raised in the bottom fifth (the lowest 20%) of income that rose into the top
fifth (upper 20%) of income.
The graph is a New York Times graphic [ Click here ] from a Harvard study released last summer.
The study can be found HERE .
It's called the Equality of Opportunity Project.
Here's a list of more than 10% from the cities with the largest commuting zones --along with Los
Angeles, Detroit, Atlanta, New Orleans, and Memphis.
- Bakersfield California 12.4
- Santa Barbara California 11.8
- Salt Lake City Utah 11.5
- San Francisco California 11.2
- San Jose California 11.2
- Des Moines Iowa 11.1
- Scranton Pennsylvania 11.1
- Toms River New Jersey 10.6
- Seattle Washington 10.4
- San Diego California 10.4
- Santa Rosa California 10.3
- Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 10.3
- Modesto California 10.2
- Madison Wisconsin 10.2
- Reading Pennsylvania 10.2
- Honolulu Hawaii 10.1
- Sacramento California 10
Los Angeles California 9.6
New Orleans Louisiana 6.3%
Detroit Michigan 5.1%
Atlanta Georgia 4.0%
Memphis Tennessee 2.6%
Look at San Francisco and San Jose, ranked 4th & 5th, at 11.2 percent. 8 cities in the above list
are from California. Calfornia also represents half
of the complete list above 10% (regardless of size) that isn't part of the Dakota Shale Oil
economy. All the regions with 4% or below are in the deep south, where God is king and poverty
means you are lazy, so why should God-fearing working citizens pay taxes to the welfare state when
people should have the choice to give to charity?
Hmmm, yea that's why you morons hover around 4% and have the worst system of institutionalized
poverty in the entire nation. This is why the rest of the nation has rates above 6 percent. This
is why all those poor folk who live in your regions move somewhere else. What happened? You got
rid of welfare programs and pre-school or after school program subsidies because you thought it made
people dependent on big government and more prone to stay impoverished. Instead the opposite happens.
This is why people live in California. Economic Opportunity and social mobility are at the highest
levels of the entire nation. The economy is also very diversified, and isn't dominated by any one
industry or based on temporary resource extraction profits but on an
economic infrastructure in which the state government actually invests with taxes. Californians as a
whole support building the necessary economic infrastructure and Californians also vote at high
levels to support spending on infrastructure, whether its' roads, education, irrigation canals,
ports, bridges, transportation networks, airports, recreation centers or environmental conservation.
If you want a list of all Metropolitan Areas (regardless of size) , Click here
If you want a list for the top 100 largest cities with the largest commuting zones, Click here
|Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 16h 41m 34s|
War is Fun
Here's a poem I wrote last Thursday.
War is Fun
War is fun
fun fun fun
go get a joystick
and shoot a gun
pretend like you're superior
and when you die
it's just another turn
push the button
and start again
because war is fun
no moral hazard for the babies you kill
no sentimental attachment to the comrades who die
it's just a fucking button man
just push the fucking button man
get that interactive thrill
cuz war is fun
war hidden behind a flat screen Liquid crystal display
war summed up into points
and little trinkets that stack up on the side of the screen
to remind you of just how awesome
war is cool
and you are a stud
a veritable video game monster
this real world stuff is for the birds
you can go beyond the trivial burdens of life and die
because you are the Coptic warrior
the Truth Seeker
or whatever you call yourself
the computer code will nevertheless flatter you all the time
scripted by the humans who wrote it
and now it rotates and repeats the same message
and the entity that is your self
is just a nondescript sequence of forgotten events no one will ever see or share
like figments of your imagination
it isn't your imagination
because you aren't imagining a fucking thing
all of the images you see are outside of your brain
all the sounds
all of the words
are programmed and saved on the hard drive
you are just a follower who gives it's eyeballs to the master in exchange
for a mirage.
|Wednesday, 23 October 2013 at 1h 22m 20s|
Sorry about the lapse
Yea I know, it's been more than 30 days since my last blog post. Oh dear, I missed out on commenting
about the obvious insanity of some fools who call themselves Republicans.
I've been doing my job as a teacher of 156 high school students and practicing guitar, and so lately
that's enough for what I can handle. Not that it takes much effort to type a blog post, it's just
that the mental energy created when I engage in these expository essays has been too much for me to
handle as of the last 6 weeks or so. I still read the press and the various blogs I like to check
out, but that hasn't translated into a blog post.
If you've paid attention over the last decade to this blog, there are periods of time every year
when I go dark. Then suddenly I react with a spate of blogs and become more consistent. That's
about ready to happen, and this is probably the first in some more regular postings.
GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS