Loyalty without truth
is a trail to tyranny.
|Wednesday, 8 November 2006 at 19h 19m 8s|
|Wednesday, 8 November 2006 at 12h 35m 58s|
The Attempted Scam of Measure L
Out here in liberal-land, the sleepy coastal town of
California -- 10 miles south of San
Francisco -- got into a fight with an multi-millionaire corporate financier
from South Florida named
R. Donahue Peebles. He bought a piece of property called the Quarry and got a
measure called "L" to be voted on by the people of Pacifica, California that
would have rezoned the property for up to 355 houses.
Click here to read about the real issues of why Mr. Peebles
bothered to spend a lot of money to get Measure L passed. A lot of people
naively give Mr. Peebles a lot of respectable, non-duplicitous descriptions.
Mr. Peebles threatened to sell out to Walmart if the measure didn't pass. Some
persons now think taxes have to be raised, while believing the costs of new
homes and construction would be offset by generous forecasts of assumed future
for another view that is more realistic.
Click here for the Bay Guardian story.
A flattering article about Mr. Peebles in Inc magazine brings out the
of the fine line manipulator at work on a project he re-sold in Florida (eerily
similar to this current project) [SOURCE]
"The owners were asking for $25 million to $30 million, but no one was willing
to pay because it wasn't going to make money unless it got rezoned -- the
building couldn't be taller than 40 feet. The rezoning would take two years. I
found a loophole that would allow us to go up to 200 feet in height and offered
$10 million, contingent on the rezoning.
After the Bath Club got rezoned, a brokerage firm offered me $42 million for
And just follow the money people [SOURCE] :
The current total spending by the Peebles-funded "Yes on L" campaign through
10/21/06 is $1,310,384.78 according to the campaign's official election filing
report (warning: large 3MB Adobe Acrobat PDF file).
That's $415,247.75 just over the last 21 days, or $19,773.70 per day.
Only $3,502.47-- less than 1% of the money spent this period-- went to Pacifica
businesses, and almost all of it was rent for office space. If Measure L is
supposed to be a financial boon to Pacifica businesses, it sure hasn't been so
The Peebles-funded campaign spent $103,455.39 on a firm in San Francisco for
canvassers to go door-to-door here.
This land is a cold, wind driven open space along side a rising mountain that
is boxed in by ocean and one four lane highway. There is no study or plan that
355 houses can be feasibly built, but nevertheless the number is 355.
Now this big Florida land-developer Peebles buys the property a year ago, yet
he offers no development plan? He insists he get Measure L passed so the
number of houses can become 355, because it is quite possible that an official
study would determine a number less than 300.
Keep in mind his own words :"After the Bath Club got rezoned, a brokerage
firm offered me $42 million for the property."
I don't believe this financial minded buisness savvy investor buys anything
without a plan. The plan was to use Measure L as a means to obtain a favorable
re-zoning that could not have occurred by the normal means. Peebles is not
interested in doing the development himself, or else he would have put one
together. Instead he spends more than a million dollars trying to get Measure
L passed so he can use the Measure to inflate the value of the land and resell
it for a profit, maybe to another "brokerage firm."
David Blackman needs to re-join the do nothing minority that he represents.
How much of his campaign funding helped him build those expensive pugnacious
wooden green signs that he placed everywhere ? He also bought a quarter page ad
in the Pacifica Tribute where he talked about the "quarry project" that he "was
involved in" and swore this was only the first step, as if he was an
The first step to what, David? Tell us what you really know.
Obviously Pacificans see right through you, that's why you got 5th place with
only 14.2% of the 3,000 who bothered to vote yesterday.
|Wednesday, 8 November 2006 at 17h 25m 0s|
The news media according to Hugh Hewitt
And it is a wonderful day for new media, especially talk radio. For two years
we have had to defend the Congressional gang that couldn't shoot straight. Now
we get to play offense.
As Dean has pointed out, congratulations are in order to the Dems who ran a
skillful campaign that kept the focus on the GOP's scandals and away from the
left's agenda. The GOP couldn't recover from Foley's repulsive conduct, and the
enemy was willing to kill randomly in the run-up to the vote in order to
demoralize an American public.
From Hugh Hewitt, a good-ole boy
television "personality" explaining why he is a media hack. Hewitt defends
corruption and incompetence, and attacks progress and integrity. That is what
he meant when he said "we get to play offense." Notice how smoothly he says
the Democrats "kept the focus on the GOP's scandals and away from the left's
agenda" and sort of blames the Iraqi conflict for being "willing to kill
randomly ... in order to demoralize" the American public.
Are you kidding me? Dragging out that bogeyman called the "Left's agenda" in
order to not talk about the issues, which is, Hubert, what the agenda of the
Democratic party is all about : how to end the corruption you busily defend,
how to stop the incompetence you make excuses for, how to truly put the nations
finances in order instead of talking tough and doing nothing. Most of all, how
to stop putting our troops in the middle of a civil war rather than lying about
it all the time.
There are a lot of persons all over the world who want to kill us. That is not
the reason you invade countries, destroy the infrastructure, rape the budget
with cost-plus contracts without reconstructing anything, and then build dozens
of permanent bases armed by men with guns.
You are demoralizing the American public Mr. Hewitt.
Read the entire article if you want, but Hewitt is full of shit. He's a
artist. That's why the corporate media allows him to speak on televsion on the
|Friday, 3 November 2006 at 19h 5m 17s|
This is unbelievable
[SOURCE -- The New York Times.]
November 3, 2006
Congress Tells Auditor in Iraq to Close Office
By JAMES GLANZ
Investigations led by a Republican lawyer named Stuart W. Bowen Jr. in Iraq
have sent American occupation officials to jail on bribery and conspiracy
charges, exposed disastrously poor construction work by well-connected
companies like Halliburton and Parsons, and discovered that the military did
not properly track hundreds of thousands of weapons it shipped to Iraqi
And tucked away in a huge military authorization bill that President Bush
signed two weeks ago is what some of Mr. Bowen’s supporters believe is his
reward for repeatedly embarrassing the administration: a pink slip.
The order comes in the form of an obscure provision that terminates his federal
oversight agency, the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq
Reconstruction, on Oct. 1, 2007. The clause was inserted by the Republican side
of the House Armed Services Committee over the objections of Democratic
counterparts during a closed-door conference, and it has generated surprise and
some outrage among lawmakers who say they had no idea it was in the final
|Thursday, 2 November 2006 at 18h 51m 37s|
Grand Opera Pugilists
|Thursday, 2 November 2006 at 18h 43m 40s|
The Meat Industry
Click here for an
incredible online video documentary about the American Meat industry from
chickens and turkeys, to pork and cattle. It is narrated by Alec Baldwin, and
will surely blow your mind and make you reconsider your eating habits.
|Wednesday, 1 November 2006 at 19h 42m 10s|
Expenses for the dead
here for the Reuters article by Andrea Shalal-Esa published in the
The U.S. Air Force is asking the Pentagon's leadership for a staggering $50
billion in emergency funding for fiscal 2007 -- an amount equal to nearly half
its annual budget, defense analyst Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute
said on Tuesday.
. . .
"This amount of money is so much bigger than the Air Force would normally
request ... it hints at a basic breakdown in the process for planning and
funding war costs," said Thompson
So in other words, it looks like the budget on the books has plenty of extra
hidden costs in the years ahead. But don't worry, we can just raise the debt
ceiling(click for google
search), which is currently 8.2 trillion dollars.
here for Representative Ron Paul's view in 2003 on government debt.
(Note: Ron Paul is that rare Republican with actual integrity who is
worth listening to.)
Of course, the budget would not be taxed had we not ventured off on these
foreign escapades, instead of coordinating a world collective of police
agencies to ferret out the terrorist cells and networks. So far this has been
the most effective method to date, rather than invading countries, writing the
constitutions, and building permanent bases in those countries.
Okay, let's just play the devil's advocate. Taking out Saddam was a good
thing. Why are we building fourteen permanent bases in what is supposed to be a
sovereign nation? Did France build military bases in the United States when
they helped the American colonists defeat Great Britain in 1779-1783 ? The new
government has been established, why are American soldiers responsible for the
history of the Iraqi nation? The Iraqi people want us to go, and we are
wasting American lives that are better spending in other parts of the world.
The day of reckoning is near. Why do I hear a distant snowball coming?
|Wednesday, 1 November 2006 at 18h 6m 32s|
Faulty machines, again
Why do the computer voting glitches always favor the
it ... Why?
[SOURCE : KFDM Channel 6]
There's a video to watch at the link above too. Click here to watch.
Early voting runs through Friday, November 3rd.
KFDM continues to get complaints from Jefferson County voters who say the
electronic voting machines are not registering their votes correctly.
Friday night, KFDM reported about people who had cast straight Democratic
ticket ballots, but the touch-screen machines indicated they had voted a
straight Republican ticket.
Some of those voters including Lamar University professor, Dr. Bruce Drury,
believe the problem is a programming error.
Saturday, KFDM spoke to another voter who says it's not just happening with
straight ticket voting, he says it's happening on individual races as well,
Jerry Stopher told us when he voted for a Democrat, the Republican's name was
Stopher said, "There's something in these machines, in this equipment, that's
showing Republican votes when you vote for Democrats, and I know Ms. Guidry's a
nice lady, and she's working hard, but her theory that my fingernail was
somehow over the Republican button is just unrealistic, my fingernail was not.
The equipment is not working properly as far as I can tell
[SOURCE: Miami Herald , 28
Debra A. Reed voted with her boss on Wednesday at African-American Research
Library and Cultural Center near Fort Lauderdale. Her vote went smoothly, but
boss Gary Rudolf called her over to look at what was happening on his machine.
He touched the screen for gubernatorial candidate Jim Davis, a Democrat, but
the review screen repeatedly registered the Republican, Charlie Crist.
Mauricio Raponi wanted to vote for Democrats across the board at the Lemon City
Library in Miami on Thursday. But each time he hit the button next to the
candidate, the Republican choice showed up. Raponi, 53, persevered until the
machine worked. Then he alerted a poll worker.
Not one story about someone trying to vote Republican but the machine
persistantly chooses the Democratic candidate instead. Not one single story in
2004 and now 2006. All of the stories of voting "irregularities" favor the
Computers fail randomly. How is this 100% favorability rate possible without
some intended design?
Yes, they are stealing the votes. They pay the news media millions and
billions to spin the reason why they win and to get all of us to focus on non-
issues, when the actual reason they are winning comes from the multiplicity of
Republican's anti-democratic tactics.
This isn't political. I would detest the Democratic party was equal
excoriation if they were also anti-democratic, but it is not the Democratic
party which has become infested with neo-con fascist nazi's.
They have to cheat because they know they will lose if they fight fair. They
have to fund lie manufacturing and pay for liars to act like lawyers because
the truth will defeat them everytime. They can't stand an honest discussion of
ideas and thoughts, because they don't care what anyone thinks and are not
interested in talking. They know better than you, so get outta the way.
Then when they fuck up everything that they do, when they turn their back on
every belief they ever espoused, then it is god damn pride that they spray
like arrogance to vehemently insist upon their unblemished wisdom and integrity.
|Tuesday, 31 October 2006 at 21h 36m 54s|
From M. Kane Jeeves [SOURCE
] -- always a good read.
Rummy was in full fang mode because, the day before, hot on the heels of Bush
banishing the terms “stay the course,” “time-tables,” and, presumably, “cut and
run” (replacing them with “shifting our tactics” and “constant
readjustment,” “the Iraqis meeting benchmarks” and “severing and sauntering”),
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki smacked-down the U.S., stating: “I affirm
that this government represents the will of the people and no one has the right
to impose a timetable on it.”
Then he said the new Bush plan was prompted by American electoral politics: “I
am sure that this is not the official policy of the U.S. government, but it is
a result of the election race going on and we are not much concerned with it.”
Ignoring the real world as usual, Rumsfeld attacked the press for playing up
the U.S.-Iraqi dust-up: ” Well, it’s a political season, and everyone’s trying
to make a little mischief out of this and make — turn it into a political
football and see if we can’t get it on the front page of every newspaper and
find a little daylight between what the Iraqis say or someone in the United
States says or somebody else in the United States says.
“And I mean, it is not complicated. I’ve explained it two or three times. The
president did an excellent job of explaining it yesterday. ”
In terms of these new “benchmarks,” the Iraqis are supposed to “meet?” Rummy
declared: “Now, you’re looking for some sort of a guillotine to come flowing
down if some date isn’t met. That is not what this is about. This is
complicated stuff. It’s difficult. We’re looking out into the future. No one
can predict the future with absolute certainty.”
|Tuesday, 31 October 2006 at 21h 22m 22s|
Latest polls on the House races
thanks to Kevin Drum at the washington monthly.
GOTO THE NEXT 10 COLUMNS